.223 for bear, deer, elk and moose.

Joined
Jun 25, 2016
Messages
99
I modified a 308 mag with jb weld to run 223 with 75 elds it looks like it should work but I’m still waiting for my rifle to get back to test it officially.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Id like to see it too. I put some 223 in my 308 mag and it looked like the feed lips are a little further apart and were only holding the very back of the case.
 

rabbithuntr

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Apr 13, 2023
Messages
221
7f2d1a6b329741ffee401236751fc590.jpg

cf226117a75ad5bea964694e5c3f1f79.jpg


The piece on the side is cut from a 30/06
The nose is a little higher than the factory mag but the head is right at the same height.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Joined
Aug 18, 2015
Messages
1,010
Location
Harrisburg, Oregon
Tikka's rifles are proofed to the CIP (Long French acronym for Permanent International Commission for the Proof of Small Arms). The CIP max pressure for the .223 Remington is 4300 bar, while the SAAMI max pressure is 3800 bar. The NATO standard for 5.56 is 4300 bar. The U.S. military follows SAAMI pressure guidelines. That's basically a long way of saying that a Tikka .223 barrel is proofed at 5.56 NATO pressures.

Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk

Too much TAC with a 75 ELDM in hot conditions will change the way you look at the world.



P
 

Chris_in_Idaho

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Aug 20, 2021
Messages
297
The NATO standard for 5.56 is 4300 bar. The U.S. military follows SAAMI pressure guidelines. That's basically a long way of saying that a Tikka .223 barrel is proofed at 5.56 NATO pressures.

Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk
Is that 4300 bar standard for 5.56 assuming the 5.56 ammo is being fired from a 5.56 chamber with the long sloppy freebore?

Firing the same 5.56 ammo in a standard 223 Remington chamber causes even higher than typical "5.56 pressure" because the bullet can no longer make the easy initial jump to hit the rifling.

This is why chambers with a gradual lead such as 223 Wylde came to be. To try to maintain some of the precision of the 223 chambering without causing the pressure spike.

In this case I have read elsewhere that a Tikka has a chamber similar to a Wylde and it can legitimately use 5.56 ammo without exceeding allowable pressure.

But in general, comparing the stated pressure of 5.56 ammo against the allowable pressure of a 223 rifle is faulty logic because "5.56 pressure" is only true from a 5.56 chamber.

Sorry, soapbox rant complete...

On that, now that Finland became a NATO member 8 months ago, do you think Tikka will begin marking their rifles with "5.56 NATO"?
 

Anschutz

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Mar 19, 2017
Messages
227
Location
Fairbanks, AK
Is that 4300 bar standard for 5.56 assuming the 5.56 ammo is being fired from a 5.56 chamber with the long sloppy freebore?

Firing the same 5.56 ammo in a standard 223 Remington chamber causes even higher than typical "5.56 pressure" because the bullet can no longer make the easy initial jump to hit the rifling.

This is why chambers with a gradual lead such as 223 Wylde came to be. To try to maintain some of the precision of the 223 chambering without causing the pressure spike.

In this case I have read elsewhere that a Tikka has a chamber similar to a Wylde and it can legitimately use 5.56 ammo without exceeding allowable pressure.

But in general, comparing the stated pressure of 5.56 ammo against the allowable pressure of a 223 rifle is faulty logic because "5.56 pressure" is only true from a 5.56 chamber.

Sorry, soapbox rant complete...

On that, now that Finland became a NATO member 8 months ago, do you think Tikka will begin marking their rifles with "5.56 NATO"?
You are correct. I did miss that throat piece. It shouldn't be a factor with factory loads because manufacturers are loading under the max, but I wouldn't take the max load some yahoo on the internet came up with on their 5.56. That'd be unsafe loading practice to begin with, though.

Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk
 

xsn10s

WKR
Joined
May 3, 2022
Messages
387
Am I seeing that some guys are shooting the black hill 556 77 gr ammo in their Tikka 223 rifles? If so, any pressure issues? Always read that was a 'no no'.
If anything happens the first thing any manufacturer is going to ask is "What ammo and do you have the case that failed.". Once that is established it's easy to say that 5.56 is not approved for .223 Remington chambers due to chamber pressure.
 
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Messages
1,023
Location
Central Cal
@Pharmseller - If you mentioned it before I missed it; but would you mind telling us how much TAC and what temps caused that? I’m currently using TAC behind a 77SMK at 2720. Haven’t seen any issues on hot days yet, but definitely not looking to find out.
 

Drenalin

WKR
Joined
Nov 15, 2018
Messages
2,725
Saw 4 more shot with the 73 ELD-M today. Two of them ran a little less than a hundred yards, the others dropped. Internal damage was in line with what I’ve seen consistently this year. Got one exit, which was extremely dramatic. Shots were at 30 yards, 196 yards, 212 yards, and 294 yards. No pics this time.

Edit to add: these were all whitetails.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 18, 2015
Messages
1,010
Location
Harrisburg, Oregon
@Pharmseller - If you mentioned it before I missed it; but would you mind telling us how much TAC and what temps caused that? I’m currently using TAC behind a 77SMK at 2720. Haven’t seen any issues on hot days yet, but definitely not looking to find out.

Well, let’s just say it was a lot, like more than Ramshot’s max for 5.56, and it was over 80 F.

Edit to add, it’s the only only only time I’ve exceeded book max.



P
 

z987k

WKR
Joined
Sep 9, 2020
Messages
1,467
Location
AK
No, I wouldn’t use those unless forced. DRT Technology makes a powdered tungsten cored bullet that behaves more like a Berger. The 79gr .224 and 135gr 6.5mm seem to do well.
The 62gr works pretty well for the guys that don't have the twist for the 79. The BC to speed tradeoff actually works in the 62gr's favor past where anyone's shooting an animal with a 223.
 
Top