2

charvey9

WKR
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
1,685
Location
Hamilton, MT
As I already said, I would not call the vibration I experienced with the Nitrum bad, but could certainly feel the difference between the aluminum and carbon riser. For me there was enough of a difference that I chose the CST hands down. I'm not really sure how my review got spun into the vibration of the Nitrum being terrible.

For the record, both bows I shot were set up with stabs, drop away rests, good sight, etc at The Bow Rack. I trust that both were set up perfectly to test shoot.
 

Manosteel

WKR
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
1,391
Location
Alberta, Canada
As I already said, I would not call the vibration I experienced with the Nitrum bad, but could certainly feel the difference between the aluminum and carbon riser. For me there was enough of a difference that I chose the CST hands down. I'm not really sure how my review got spun into the vibration of the Nitrum being terrible.

For the record, both bows I shot were set up with stabs, drop away rests, good sight, etc at The Bow Rack. I trust that both were set up perfectly to test shoot.
Charvey9
My review was not based on what you said, I agree with pretty much everything you stated. I completely agree with your assement of the difference between the two bows when it comes to feel - i.e. being one is carbon and the other Aluminum. My comments were more directed at the crazies at Archery Talk who said they picked up the Nitrum - shot them and said it was like a tunning folk in the hand - Not True. The bow is dead in the hand and their is only a very slight buzz in the one I shot. I had to close my eyes and feel the bow/shot process to notice.

If I did go back to an Aluminum riser it would be the Nitrum in a heart beat.
 

kodiakfly

WKR
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
1,397
Location
Kodiak
I'm not really sure how my review got spun into the vibration of the Nitrum being terrible.

Because you said this-

I also shot the Nitrum turbo, and although it had been awhile since I had fired an aluminum riser bow, I couldn't believe the difference in hand shock compared to carbon. The Nitrum is a good bow, but do not think I would want to go back to shooting an aluminum riser for that reason alone.

Maybe we read you wrong, but using a word like "shock" and saying that even though the Nitrum was a good bow you'd not shoot it due to the vibe alone and that it's enough to warrant the extra $500 for the CST. That just makes it sound like a significant issue. Glad to hear it's not.
 

charvey9

WKR
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
1,685
Location
Hamilton, MT
Because you said this-



Maybe we read you wrong, but using a word like "shock" and saying that even though the Nitrum was a good bow you'd not shoot it due to the vibe alone and that it's enough to warrant the extra $500 for the CST. That just makes it sound like a significant issue. Glad to hear it's not.

Understood. I was trying to emphasize my surprise at the difference between carbon and aluminum riser in general, not that the Nitrum hand shock/vibration was terrible. Although I have shot Carbon for a few years, in the back of my mind I thought the "dead in the hand" was more hype than truth. Shooting them side-by-side I could feel the difference, and that is enough for me to stick with Carbon.
 

kodiakfly

WKR
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
1,397
Location
Kodiak
Gotcha. I can believe that. The "dealer" in town got got a Nitrum in. And while he doesn't have anywhere to actually shoot it, I as able to get my hands on it. So I can't speak to the vibe, but I can speak to that little half pound or whatever it is between it and the CS. Maybe it's because we're just talking about less than 4 lbs total, but that half pound felt like a lot.

I'm still on the fence, but after reading what OR Archer said about the significant upcost of the brown on the aluminums, and me shooting a CE now...the Nitrum is losing points next to the CST.
 

MattB

WKR
Joined
Sep 29, 2012
Messages
5,743
Once you slap 2+ pounds of accessories on both, the ~6 oz. weight difference won't be nearly as noticeable. I still prefer carbon to aluminum for the vibration dampening and the fact that it doesn't feel as cold in cold weather.
 

Manosteel

WKR
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
1,391
Location
Alberta, Canada
The other benefit of carbon that I like is that its' lightweight nature allows you play with stabilizer weight more since you are starting off anywhere from 6oz to a half pound+ lighter than comparable Aluminum bows
 
Top