eric1115
WKR
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2018
- Messages
- 1,284
That question was directed at @BuckSmasher, who has repeatedly now called out the .22 cal bullets as categorically unethical and a bad choice. I have a guess but I am curious to know what he bases his opinion on. Those of us who actually have experience with this bullet generally don't find it to be marginal, unethical, or ineffective. It's worth noting that a .223 with mono (like TSX, etc) or hard bonded bullets like Accubonds are very much not what we're recommending generally. The Sierra 77 TMK is the bullet for rifles chambered in .2235.56.I’m not familiar at with the 77 TMK. I’ll have to do some research.
DON'T HAVE TIME TO READ 176 PAGES? HERE'S THE CHEAT SHEET.
“Bullets matter more than headstamps.”
“Spent primers offer the supreme tutorial”.
I’ve read it here and elsewhere online. It got my attention. I started digging and asking questions and listened.
The 77gr TMK delivered by a .223 is where I ended up after many discussions and objective data regarding bullet performance and numerous pics of field results.
Now for the delivery system. Accurate. Repeatable. Reliable. Reasonable weight to afford steady shot placement and the ability to spot my own impacts...
“Bullets matter more than headstamps.”
“Spent primers offer the supreme tutorial”.
I’ve read it here and elsewhere online. It got my attention. I started digging and asking questions and listened.
The 77gr TMK delivered by a .223 is where I ended up after many discussions and objective data regarding bullet performance and numerous pics of field results.
Now for the delivery system. Accurate. Repeatable. Reliable. Reasonable weight to afford steady shot placement and the ability to spot my own impacts...
This is the thread a few of us have referred to where lots of data and photos are provided. It's a master class in terminal performance and well worth the read even if you decide not to hunt with that bullet.
