Wyoming HB 00600: Dang those "grass-gobbling elk"

sneaky

"DADDY"
Joined
Feb 1, 2014
Messages
10,063
Location
ID
It's Wyoming, does this surprise you?

Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk
 

jmez

WKR
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
7,427
Location
Piedmont, SD
WY ranchers want transferable land owner tags.

Sent from my moto g power 5G - 2023 using Tapatalk
 

jmez

WKR
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
7,427
Location
Piedmont, SD
Properties need to be big in WY. Stocking rates for grazing are pretty high in most of the west and profit per animal unit is low. The only way to make it work is numbers. A lot of ranchers are asset rich and cash poor.

Sent from my moto g power 5G - 2023 using Tapatalk
 

fatlander

WKR
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
1,931
Properties need to be big in WY. Stocking rates for grazing are pretty high in most of the west and profit per animal unit is low. The only way to make it work is numbers. A lot of ranchers are asset rich and cash poor.

Sent from my moto g power 5G - 2023 using Tapatalk

Sell elk hunts.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: Duh

manitou1

WKR
Joined
Mar 29, 2017
Messages
1,755
Location
Wyoming
Got this from Gary Fralick, Wyo Bio. Did a search and couldnt find it. If it's up somewhere else, PM so I can pull this one so all the discussion stays in one place:

https://cowboystatedaily.com/2024/0...rs-for-grass-gobbling-elk-could-break-budget/

HB0060: Excess wildlife population damage amendments.

Another significant bill that we are following is HB0060: Excess wildlife population damage amendments. This bill brought by the Joint Agriculture, State and Public Lands & Water Resources Interim Committee is an amendment to current statutes relating to damage claims. It proposes to include Elk specific damage to forage and grass as eligible for reimbursement at a rate of 150% of fair market value.

Wyoming Wildlife Federation is against this bill as it is written and will be asking representatives to reduce the reimbursement rate to match fair market value to better align with existing statutes. HB0060 has been referred to the House Appropriations Committee and will be discussed today, Tuesday, February 20th in the evening. You can tune in here.

@realunlucky
Imagine if Missouri, Alabama, Iowa, etc reimbursed their farmers for what whitetail, rabbits, turkey, ducks, geese eat.
This is another rancher welfare handout.
Why you ask?
Because from the governor on down, the politicians in Wyoming are all ranchers.
 

jmez

WKR
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
7,427
Location
Piedmont, SD
Imagine if Missouri, Alabama, Iowa, etc reimbursed their farmers for what whitetail, rabbits, turkey, ducks, geese eat.
This is another rancher welfare handout.
Why you ask?
Because from the governor on down, the politicians in Wyoming are all ranchers.
Those states don't need to do that. Those are farming states, not ranching. They have the farm lobby. Farms subsidies and ranch subsidies are completely different.

Sent from my moto g power 5G - 2023 using Tapatalk
 

drdrop

FNG
Joined
Aug 9, 2020
Messages
87
Location
Laramie
The dangerous thing about this bill is that it mandates these payments come out of the Game and Fish budget instead of the general fund. Estimates by G&F indicated this could easily run into the millions of dollars per year.

The sponsors/ag lobby of this bill want to "teach Game and Fish a lesson for letting the elk herd get to where it's at" to paraphrase an ag lobbyist. Hunter and angler dollars unexpectedly going to fund this program could be devastating to the agency's budget. G&F has a 5 year plan to manage these elk. Let's give the experts their space to do that. HB60 is no better than ballot box biology! Politicians shouldn't mandate how to manage wildlife.

This bill needs killed. Tell the Rec Committee how this is a bad deal for G&F before noon Friday.


[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]
 

RMM

WKR
Joined
Jan 30, 2021
Messages
325
Location
PA
Since when was this not the case? Many ranchers and farmers would shoot on site any elk, deer, antelope etc they found on their property. Then they discovered they had a value so tresspass fees became a thing and leases and more outfitters/guides. Now a lot of these guys can double dip. Charge hunters, while not allowing enough to cut back the population on their ranch...deny access to people who would happily shoot a few elk, then charge the government (taxpayer) for having too many elk on their place.

I know a bunch of good ranchers that like the wildlife around, take care of their land, and let people hunt. They get too many elk or deer on their place. They let people come and kill some does or cows.
This is exactly what I saw this year in Wyoming. One of the biggest landowners in the unit was complaining that there were too many elk and they were damaging his ranch. The unit used to be a 10+ point unit. Wyoming changed it to a general unit and now the public land, which only has one access point, is being hammered. The landowner will not allow people to cross a small piece of his private to access big chunks of public. He conveniently is also an outfitter and can now sell way more hunts because there are way more eligible tag holders.
 

jmez

WKR
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
7,427
Location
Piedmont, SD
Guess WY will just have to raise tag prices again.

Sent from my moto g power 5G - 2023 using Tapatalk
 
Joined
Mar 29, 2019
Messages
686
It’s becoming a problem in multiple states in areas with lots of private land. I’m glad to see this bill die and hope they come up with a solution.
 
Joined
Jun 15, 2017
Messages
428
Location
Wyoming
It’s becoming a problem in multiple states in areas with lots of private land. I’m glad to see this bill die and hope they come up with a solution.
I'll probably get thrown out of the state for saying it but ... To be honest, I'd love to see more nonresident opportunity to have a crack at these burgeoning herds. I'm sure one of the main challenges lies in access to private land, but I'd say let the out of staters at least take a crack at it
 
Top