wapitibob
WKR
I'm one that really doesn't like to see artificial barriers put up so the "other guy" doesn't get a tag, while I keep mine. As well as "we need to make it hard for people" while spoon feeding our kids and friends the info.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not sure if you are aware, but the 200,000 non residents that hold elk preference points is more than 1/3 of the entire population of the state. There are only about 50,000 residents that hunt elk. They should have a tag every year and honestly I am surprised they haven't gone to 90/10 for the limited quota tags. Giving non-residents 16% of those tags is generous and I for one am thankful.There has to be a middle ground.
Agree completely. I really hope the price to hunt doesn't get so high it becomes a rich man's game.I'm one that really doesn't like to see artificial barriers put up so the "other guy" doesn't get a tag, while I keep mine. As well as "we need to make it hard for people" while spoon feeding our kids and friends the info.
No, 6 points will not guarantee a tag.The question posed was “Do we think 6 points will guarantee the tag again in 2026”?
Yes or No
————
The application deadline has passed.
That might work, so basically not allow a points only period. Force people To apply for a tag to get a point, I don’t hate it. Hell with the way Wyoming holds money for 4-5 months they may go for thatI think they could manage the creep if they wanted to.
Make people apply and front the money in order to gain points.
When Colorado removed the requirement to front your tag money, applications increased dramatically.
Make points expensive and the barrier to entry will slow some people down. Unfortunately, that's not in their interest because selling points is essentially free money for them.
please see the prior comments where I said non residents SHOULD get a tag every year, and SHOULD get the majority of the tags in the state. I have no bone to pick with residents, jealous of the ease in which they receive a tag, sure but I have no issue with them.Not sure if you are aware, but the 200,000 non residents that hold elk preference points is more than 1/3 of the entire population of the state. There are only about 50,000 residents that hunt elk. They should have a tag every year and honestly I am surprised they haven't gone to 90/10 for the limited quota tags. Giving non-residents 16% of those tags is generous and I for one am thankful.
I agree! It’s already crazy expensive, I don’t think you fix it by raising costs, if you do the rich man wins every time. Maybe do like montana, if you don’t apply you purge your points(For the general tag).Agree completely. I really hope the price to hunt doesn't get so high it becomes a rich man's game.
Why you trying to rage bait the NR's?There isn't an Elk shortage problem in WY, we can still get 3 tags.
Question: how many leftover cow/calf tags is a NR allowed to purchase, if they are available? Just one or are they unlimited?There isn't an Elk shortage problem in WY, we can still get 3 tags.
Why you trying to rage bait the NR's?![]()