Would you buy this scope?

[Kyguy]

For everyone making suggestions for how THEY want the scope..... pretty sure that the three Form is showing and testing are the final format. They aren't changing anything at this point barring a catastrophic failure or weakness exposed during testing.

 

[intunegp]

For everyone making suggestions for how THEY want the scope..... pretty sure that the three Form is showing and testing are the final format. They aren't changing anything at this point barring a catastrophic failure or weakness exposed during testing.

Correct. He said a few pages back that the manufacturer does not consider these prototypes, but a production-ready product and if it doesn't work they won't know how to fix it. I don't think major changes are an option at this point. It comes to market or it gets scrapped and goes back to the drawing board.

 

[Frozenlead]

@Formidilosus, @Ryan Avery what are the values of the Subtensions for the reticle?

.2mil

 

[Schmo]

For everyone making suggestions for how THEY want the scope..... pretty sure that the three Form is showing and testing are the final format. They aren't changing anything at this point barring a catastrophic failure or weakness exposed during testing.

Can I get an amen?

 

[Q_Sertorius]

Can I get an amen?

Amen!

 

[mtnbound]

@Formidilosus @Ryan Avery, let me rephrase my question. Does this look correct for the reticle subtensions?

 

[Frozenlead]

That looks correct to me. Fancier than what I drew. . I’ll leave this here for all the MOA fans though.

 

[BLJ]

That looks correct to me. Fancier than what I drew. . I’ll leave this here for all the MOA fans though.

All but one of my scopes is in MOA.

That’s funny.

 

[mlevimadden]

That looks correct to me. Fancier than what I drew. . I’ll leave this here for all the MOA fans though.

Man the length some of you guys will go to avoid MILs is impressive. In the next MOA versus MIL thread, someone can just post these two images side by side and then lock the thread.