Would you buy this scope?

[Chris in TN]

I laugh but if S2H came up with their own Brawndo people in here would line up to pre-fund the production costs
View attachment 1011532

Yes. Guilty. Because I'm thirsty for a scope that works.

 

[BBob]

Because I'm thirsty for a scope that works.

Same, but I’m old and have finally learned to have a little patience

 

[RockAndSage]

No matter what my design intentions was, it is how it is utilized by the end-user that matters. I'll just add some trivia.

Good summary by @RockAndSage, the only error was 2).
It was explicitly a tacticool supersniper reticle.

It's built on the principle of "fundamental surprise" and aligning design with actual training.

For some cool guys, it is incredibly difficult to understand that things that has never happened before happens all the time. Hence a design that primes the correct decision. It is daft to believe that you will be able to go via a complex abstract when you are already knocked on your ass.

Before you say "not me", there is an overwhelming amount of data and deaths in aviation that says so. Are the average shooter/sniper really selected better than a fighter pilot? "OK, we got your test results aaaaand we think this rifle//airplane is a good fit for your abilities..." (not how it works, but...)

Central to this design was the square. Regardless of observation angle, either the target fits or it does not. Shoot, Aim Short or Long. Simple decisions to raze the first 600m. No need to remember a trajectory, find a number with a name and then interpret that value into a reticle or turret.

4)The increasing line thickness was similarily designed to align with magnification/FOV and the many variables of fleeting runners. Outside a stupid range, you're never going to assess the variables and you're reduced to "legal target?" and "staple through" from a reasonable bracket based on time of flight / target speed.

3) Other ranging features was not really something I believe in, but if the cadre insists on being inefficient, at least be less inefficient and place them "here" to give the least disturbance and fastest transition for the shooter.

Since I took the money for this project out of my own pocket, I also made some adjustments for my own hunting.

The S2H scope is a good scrub and good fit for hunting.

Edit:
... someone asked about lack of vertical above horisontal x dimesion. My opinion is that clear observation and ability to "see" peak of trajectory in the reticle has greater value. Almost every manufacturer fails here as they tend to put in at least 2 mrad which is too much as it doesn't simplify the killing.

This was really awesome - thank you for both clarifying, and for interacting with us here. It's very helpful, and appreciated.

 

[Wrongside]

Yeah, he’s from Norway.

 

[260284]

Turrets:

Elevation is 10 miles per rev, revolution indicated, with a zero stop. The zero stop is ginormous. I don’t think I’ve seen one quite like it.
View attachment 1009980

It has three screws around the edges that you loosen to drop. It is a pin on pin design- similar to others, but not quite the same- much larger in diameter, and the turrets spindle is thicker/bigger.
View attachment 1009981



Windage is 10 mils per rev, marked left and right.

View attachment 1009996


Again, the turrets spindle is a thick boy under there.
View attachment 1009997

That reminds me of the LRHS zero stop.

 

[THLR]

View attachment 1011549

Yes Norwegian. We were the ISIS of 800 AD, and for some reason we seem to be proud of it...