Would you buy this scope?

[nm.otter]

I used to think it looked like a chore to be taking glasses on and off ... and then my eyes shifted in a matter of months and had more empathy.

I've seen different people try various methods - fully taking them on and off is a lot of excess movement. Putting them on top of your head can get in the way of earpro (and make the inside of the lens funky from sweat, sunscreen, hair oil, etc). I've found it works to just bump them down my nose to shoot, and then pull them back up. Can be done with the firing hand at the end of a shot sequence in under a second.

Get a pair of these and have your prescription put in them. I have a pair of their 1.25x readers for close work in the field and a pair of their goggles that are perfect for cross-country skiing in mild weather.

Maybe one of these would help you old fellas out.

Gen II Pro Series Turret Magnifier

Gen II Pro Series Turret Magnifier The MK Machining Gen II Pro Series Turret Magnifier has been designed to incorporate a new lens that allows for much more magnification. It still easily mounts to your scope tube and now provides a varying amount of magnification depending on placement...

www.mkmachining.com

I can see the turret numbers and bubble level well enough without readers. Fine detail not so much, so reducing the clutter is attractive.

I dont understand the request? Like have no markings at all other than at half and whole mils?

@THLR and I like that idea, but appear to be a minority. I still think dots would be workable for everyone.

 

[Harvey_NW]

Ironic, I came across a Zero Tech ad on facebook a while back and commented "build a scope that passes the drop test on Rokslide and you'll sell a pile". Apparently they listened

 

[Dobermann]

Get a pair of these and have your prescription put in them. I have a pair of their 1.25x readers for close work in the field and a pair of their goggles that are perfect for cross-country skiing in mild weather.

I think they're similar to what Jacob Bynum uses. Watching him navigate them, it looks like it takes more time to get them back on your face than just bumping glasses down your nose.

 

[BRTreedogs]

A bad ass no doubt.

No- I don’t care at all what you think about products. You are free to post anything that you think I have factually been incorrect on and try to demonstrate it.

As you just stated, and as you post often- you generally offer nothing substantive.
You, along with a few others seem to be more upset that people/companies do not value your opinions or views, more so than you actually believe there is anything actually wrong- it seems to be the crux of the issue.






Nothing is ever as described? Please give examples of the products or (training I suppose) that isn’t as described.

Look you have lots of valuable experience and I’ve taken it into account and adjusted some of the products I use because of it.

But I just think it pathetic how most of the members on here adore you like a like you’re the only one that’s ever done anything of value and you’re the only one that has anything to offer.

I’m not a bad ass but I’ll do my best to stand behind my mouth, I’ve been beat up before, big whoop if it happens again. I’ve got insurance.
Rok stock was late as hell, does the raven actually exist?

But I just don’t understand these threads if you don’t care, do the development privately and drop the damn product and whoever buys it buys it.

Maven didn’t start a thread prior to launching the rs1.2

 

[nm.otter]

I think they're similar to what Jacob Bynum uses. Watching him navigate them, it looks like it takes more time to get them back on your face than just bumping glasses down your nose.

Probably so, but I was dropping and scratching 5-8 pairs of readers per year and these fixed it.

 

[Cmack0102]

Many here will know the history better than I do, but I think someone guessed tasco, and I think I remember a response saying some have guessed it without knowing it. I’m not familiar with them, but sounds like the have a vortex-esque warranty which should reassure some people.

 

[fwafwow]

Scrolling on by can be so hard.

 

[solarshooter]

What the worst that could happen?
I get beat up?

 

[Schmo]

But I just think it pathetic how most of the members on here adore you

I don’t think anyone here “adores” him. I do appreciate his experience and sharing of knowledge.

But I just don’t understand these threads if you don’t care

It was already stated to you. They needed proof that a bunch of people would be interested in such a scope, not just Form and Ryan

 

[Dualsight]

I just looked it up - yeah, I'd be willing to try that one, for sure.

I have no idea how well Burris Veracity scopes hold up to use/abuse. I've read tons of good reviews of them from people who hunt with them but don't recall a drop test. Put them in the 'I want to like it' category for now.

ETA: Well, crap, no, it is only available on the Veracity PH series, not the regular Veracity. Meh. Not terribly interested in the PH.

It is in the Veractiy too, but only in SFP, the Veracity PH is in the FFP. I do not understand the reasoning. It's almost like they liked the idea of the reticle and were not certain what to do with it (?).

Edit: Never mind, this was answered twice already.

 

[wind gypsy]

@THLR and I like that idea, but appear to be a minority. I still think dots would be workable for everyone.

Yeah, sounds like a pretty bad idea to me to not have a hash lined up to see which tenth you're on. If it weren't for all of the turret tapes out there now, i'd not consider buying such a scope.

 

[Formidilosus]

Look you have lots of valuable experience and I’ve taken it into account and adjusted some of the products I use because of it.

But I just think it pathetic how most of the members on here adore you like a like you’re the only one that’s ever done anything of value and you’re the only one that has anything to offer.

And again- there is your issue. Ego.
I’m not the only one with experience- but I am almost the only one that has presented evidence and data in large quantities. Have you? Or is it just you don’t like having the feeling that not everyone’s experience is equal and should carry the same weight with others?
Name one other person that you believe exists that has tested in a demonstrable, repeatable way- zero retention with large quantities of scopes with hundreds of thousands of live rounds?
Can you name a single person that you believe has shown more evidence, data, and information of fact based medically validated terminal ballistics?

I’m not a bad ass but I’ll do my best to stand behind my mouth, I’ve been beat up before, big whoop if it happens again. I’ve got insurance.

Again- you’re way more bad ass than me.

Rok stock was late as hell, does the raven actually exist?

I said “as described”- because that is what you wrote. What “thing” doesn’t perform as Ryan or I said it would when the consumer gets it?

But I just don’t understand these threads if you don’t care, do the development privately and drop the damn product and whoever buys it buys it.

You misunderstand shorthand- I don’t care what ignorant people think, nor do I give credence to hair-brained ideas that don’t pass even surface level critical thinking. There are lot of non ignorant people on the forum- I do care to hear their feedback. Some, have caused changes.

Maven didn’t start a thread prior to launching the rs1.2

No- they just had me test the prototypes. “Maven” also has no idea what they are doing with regards to what we/I care about.

 

[nm.otter]

sounds like a pretty bad idea to me to not have a hash lined up to see which tenth you're on.

I'm going to cover mine with a thin band of 33+ next week and see how it feels at the range.

 

[Dobermann]

Im willing to face any man on earth toe to toe.

I’m not a bad ass but I’ll do my best to stand behind my mouth, I’ve been beat up before, big whoop if it happens again. I’ve got insurance.

Interesting that your response to my post was to immediately jump to talking about violence.

Here's what I think would actually happen if you made the kind of insults you're making to a bunch of us at Ryan's house: most would just ignore you, some would just laugh, and eventually someone would gently show you the door.

 

[Johnwell]

…Im willing to face any man on earth toe to toe.

Glad that’s cleared up.

I’m definitely way wimpier than you; I wouldn’t even be willing to go toe to toe with any child on this earth.

Can we get back to the scopes instead of schoolyard taunts? My interest is piqued on the 2-8x36.

For my non-combative hunting purposes this would be pretty sweet; any idea on what it’d weigh? It’d have to be a bit lighter than the 3-9 swfa for me to see a benefit.

 

[6.5x284]

Wonder if it’s Zero Tech. They mentioned they were a fan of their 15x56 binos, and they have a FFP scope in that 26oz range that has a common LOW looking shell.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

March 28th 2025 boys! I better get a sticker with my scope purchase lol.

Loving that first look of the reticle.

 

[The Guide]

gently show you the door

Or throw a body through a window... same,same.

Jay

 

[2buffalo]

I thought Zerotech was made in China.

 

[wind gypsy]

I thought Zerotech was made in China.

Seems some are. Like athlon, vortex, maven, bushnell, and countless others.

 

[Antares]

My interest is piqued on the 2-8x36.

Agreed. I hope the 3-18 is a massive success, but I want to hear more about the 2-8... that's more my speed.