Would you buy this scope?

[SDHNTR]

scam /skăm/

noun​

1. A fraudulent business scheme; a swindle.
2. Fraudulent deal.
3. A fraudulent business scheme.

The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition • More at Wordnik

Google is your friend check it out before you use words you don’t understand.

We have a huge stock thread and over 1000 stocks sold tell me who has been ripped off? Just cause you don’t like it doesn’t mean it’s a scam or fraud.

@SDHNTR

I could continue to argue using your very same definition, but it’s pointless. I wish you the best. I may even be a customer in the future once the product is vetted and inventory settles. I just won’t be a financier.

 

[Formidilosus]

Maybe address specific feature comparisons in your answer, such as glass quality/clarity, reticle, turrets, eye relief, and such.

?
You mean what the entire thread is about?

 

[Gstew1930]

Ive been proud to be from Texas my whole life, this site is making me think I've been brain washed. I swear 90% of dumb shit said on here is people from Texas. Can we tighten up as a group please . Im not excluding myself, im aware lol

 

[betelgeuse]

Most of this discussion is good. Some is off kilter.

Get off your wallet dad

 

[lak2004]

I could continue to argue using your very same definition, but it’s pointless. I wish you the best. I may even be a customer in the future once the product is vetted and inventory settles. I just won’t be a financier.

What if I send you a check for $10000 and then when you receive the confirmation of the shipping you send me the difference? Thank you, Saudi Prince, I mean Jeff......
If you need to start a gofundme, just ask bro

 

[Coleredding00]

I’m asking what scope is better for the same intended use you have for the S2H scope if cost is not a factor?

If the overall the answer is “none”, because that’s why you’re building this one, then we want to hear it from you.

If that’s not the answer, then we want to hear that also.

Maybe address specific feature comparisons in your answer, such as glass quality/clarity, reticle, turrets, eye relief, and such.

All the ways that this will be unprecedented in quality and design, not to mention price point, has been discussed at nauseum in this thread.

But frankly he doesn't owe you an explanation of why this is better than anything else... read the details when they are available and buy one, or don't.

 

[Kfraz]

Sign me up when it comes out.

 

[Helislacker]

1. Success breeds contempt
2. All transactions are voluntary

So far, everything S2H has brought to market has kicked ass. Whether that’s the Teratorn or Rokstok. My only concern about this scope is whether it will be available in Canada.

 

[Formidilosus]

1. Success breeds contempt
2. All transactions are voluntary

So far, everything S2H has brought to market has kicked ass. Whether that’s the Teratorn or Rokstok. My only concern about this scope is whether it will be available in Canada.

I’ll make sure you get one if desired.

 

[JDZ]

?
You mean what the entire thread is about?

I’ve read most of the thread. I did get lost for a while during the last 300 posts discussing logos, colors and scams. I saw some specifics. Magnification range, objective size, reticle, reliability and that all sounds amazing for $999 in 2027 dollars. I want one!

I didn’t see where it fell in the realm of optical quality and clarity versus what is currently on the market. I didn’t see eye relief addressed. I’m not being snide or confrontational. I asked because I thought you could give an objective answer, as you are known for doing.

 

[Formidilosus]

I’ve read most of the thread. I did get lost for a while during the last 300 posts discussing logos, colors and scams. I saw some specifics. Magnification range, objective size, reticle, reliability and that all sounds amazing for $999 in 2027 dollars. I want one!

I didn’t see where it fell in the realm of optical quality and clarity versus what is currently on the market. I didn’t see eye relief addressed. I’m not being snide or confrontational. I asked because I thought you could give an objective answer, as you are known for doing.

We don’t have the scopes yet. I can’t give any information like that without seeing them.