Would you buy this scope?

[TxLite]

No


Yes

I’d buy 2 at the $1000 mark. $1500 is a little harder to swallow at 50% increase

 

[ChrisAU]

Some little integrated throw lever and light aluminum flip caps that thread into the ends would shore be nice…

 

[WyldGoose]

I'm in.
I'd likely buy two for starters and end up with another.
Up until this post I'd been waiting on the Maven restock...now I'm looking to wait n' see...

 

[Kurts86]

Yes, most definitely.

 

[Dixie]

Scope specs:

FFP 3-12x40 to 3-12x44mm

Consistently holds zero through 3-foot drops and 3,000 rounds of constant use.

The reticle is specially designed for 25 to 600 yards, with bold outer posts and correct center aiming references.

Zero Stop

Low profile top turret.

Capped windage.

Large eye box

Good glass

20oz


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Scope specs:

FFP 3-12x40 to 3-12x44mm

Consistently holds zero through 3-foot drops and 3,000 rounds of constant use.

The reticle is specially designed for 25 to 600 yards, with bold outer posts and correct center aiming references.

Zero Stop

Low profile top turret.

Capped windage.

Large eye box

Good glass

20oz


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I’m interested

 

[ResearchinStuff]

It needs to crush the swfa 3-9 and nxs 3-15 F1 on availability, and compete with the maven rs1.2 / tenmile 3-18 on price to the consumer and availability. If it pushes up into nx8 prices the reticle needs to be thlr or something else dramatically better than milxt.

 

[T_Widdy]

Yes…. But for $1500 I would hope it has:
locking elevation turret
extremely low profile capped windage
Center dot crosshair
44mm objective
30mm tube

 

[ztc92]

I’d buy one at time of release and if I liked it as much or more than the Maven RS1.2, I’d likely buy 2 more shortly thereafter and recommend it to anyone who would listen.

 

[Schmo]

It needs to crush the swfa 3-9 and nxs 3-15 F1

There are no NXS that are F1, and the NXS 3-15 is MOA only.

 

[HornPorn]

Scope specs:

FFP 3-12x40 to 3-12x44mm

Consistently holds zero through 3-foot drops and 3,000 rounds of constant use.

The reticle is specially designed for 25 to 600 yards, with bold outer posts and correct center aiming references.

Zero Stop

Low profile top turret.

Capped windage.

Large eye box

Good glass

20oz


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Does it have parallax? If so, yes, assuming price is affordable

 

[Lawnboi]

It’s going to take a lot of scope to get me to ditch my nx8s.

I’d prefer a higher mag range, specifically for antlerless hunts.

 

[ResearchinStuff]

There are no NXS that are F1, and the NXS 3-15 is MOA only.

Completely false. They exist, but are discontinued and very hard to find.

 

[Schmo]

Completely false. They exist, but are discontinued and very hard to find.

I meant current production. We are talking about scopes we can buy lol

 

[Seeknelk]

I would buy one possibly two right away.

 

[Doc Holliday]

We have Rokstock. Sounds like we are about to have Rokscope!

 

[Colby]

Scope specs:

FFP 3-12x40 to 3-12x44mm

Consistently holds zero through 3-foot drops and 3,000 rounds of constant use.

The reticle is specially designed for 25 to 600 yards, with bold outer posts and correct center aiming references.

Zero Stop

Low profile top turret.

Capped windage.

Large eye box

Good glass

20oz


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Yes I’ll buy some.

 

[ResearchinStuff]

I meant current production. We are talking about scopes we can buy lol

If you have cash in hand they're about as available as a swfa 3-9.

 

[Stocky]

I'd be in for $1k for sure id replace my mavens as I'm not a fan of the massive eye relief. For 1.5k makes a spendy scope by the time it gets to NZ but i would try atleast 1. Also it's reticle dependent.

 

[tater]

Sort out the ITAR export nonsense and even with the harsh exchange rate it would be a big seller in BC and AB.
I can think of five guys besides myself who would buy one immediately.

 

[SDHNTR]

An 8x50mm fixed power is exactly what I personally desire- however that’s a niche and won’t be sought first.

As for 3-4x on the low end- a 6x bottom end magnification variable is DOA as a hunting scope.

Agreed. I’d buy a 4-16x over a 3-12x though personally, if a 4x erector is what we’re working with.

Not so much for the field, but I do value a few extra x’s on the bench. Helps to establish a confident zero, for me anyway. And I don’t find 4x to be too much on that lower end.