Chris in TN
WKR
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2025
- Messages
- 1,816
I only have one rifle with a dot reticle. The rest of the reticle on that particular scope is garbage - great for holdovers at absurd distances but useless once the sun goes down - but man, that dot is just plain fun to shoot. I get why our grandparents raved about shooting with dot reticles. I can't explain what's different about them, I can only say I enjoy shooting with the dot.I was spending some time looking at the THLR reticle dimensions now that it's not a rush situation. At first I just saw the center dot was .145 Mil thick and thought, damn that's a really bold reticle. But said, oh well, and went with it anyways.
But it's really not a thick reticle as a whole. That's JUST the center dot. The graduations and wind holds are all in that .06 thickness ranges which really makes sense. Because you're normally only holding the center dot on where you're wanting to hit at relatively close yardages and moderate conditions, or just shooting groups. Anything 600+ is likely to have some sort of wind hold which will be utilizing the more modest thickness portions of the reticle. Even a 1/2 MOA dot can easily be used as an aim point at 1000 yards on a deer. I just thought it was a little unnecessary was all. But in reality, that center dot will almost never be used as the aim point at 1000 yards.
Just something that came to mind is all.
In that regard I think people are gonna like the dot a lot for distances and scenarios where the dot itself is the aiming point. A lot of the wind-related stuff on the THLR would be lost on me - because I don't shoot in much wind very often and have no intentions of shooting at all, at game, in higher winds at longer distances, much less on multiple animals at a time - but the bold outer crosshairs will be awesome for low light, and the dot will be quite fast.



