- Thread Starter
- #21
LostWapiti
WKR
If Wyoming residents want the rule, this would solve it completely but outfitters would be the big losers.Wyoming should keep their rule, or just make every wilderness its own unit with no non-res quota.
If Wyoming residents want the rule, this would solve it completely but outfitters would be the big losers.Wyoming should keep their rule, or just make every wilderness its own unit with no non-res quota.
Feds only have authority to manage species listed under ESA, some authority for migratory bird and federal refugesThey don't always step in but federal authorities can regulate wildlife. It’s how wolves are federally protected in places.
For about the millionth time on these forums... you are not being prevented from accessing wilderness, go walk around as much as you want whenever you want, but the state, just like EVERY state, holds management of the animals within its borders and can therefore dictate where YOU can hunt them... also, it's been tried in courts multiple times, do a little research next time.All it would take is a lawsuit against the state from any NR entity to escalate. Wilderness areas are federal lands and belong to the countries public, not WY.
Great idea we can also include if your state has no wilderness or public land to offer nr to hunt on you can't hunt the states that offer hunting on public landCreating this poll to see peoples opinion on if legislation should be proposed to prevent residents of states that ban wilderness hunting(Wyoming) for NR from hunting wilderness in other states. This would be a way to give NR power to say that the WY rule is BS. Is this a slippery slope or a worthy issue to take up?