White House rescinds public land use rule

[Gila]

Once again wild life management, hunting and fishing takes a back seat to extraction!

https://www.americanbar.org/groups/...2024-fall/2024-public-lands-rule-back-future/

 

[JohnnySeegs]

What a shame.

 

[survivalistd]

Never ends

 

[CJ19]

Once again wild life management, hunting and fishing takes a back seat to extraction!

https://www.americanbar.org/groups/...2024-fall/2024-public-lands-rule-back-future/

this is behind a pay wall so no one can see what it says. furthermore the ADA is currently in a major spat with the trump admin bc it is a politically oriented organization like so many other "professional organizations" these days. So what is the purpose of posting a link no one can read to an opinion piece headline written by an organization and author that has suffered with TDS for more then a decade. then follow by 2 worthless posts that say nothing from people who clearly couldn't read the article. Insightful but checks out for the TDS public land crowd on Rokslide and hunttalk these days. The public land lobbyist and public land crowd has lost the plot for sometime now. Can any of you "experts" explain what the public lands rule actually did?

 

[HighUintas]

this is behind a pay wall so no one can see what it says. furthermore the ADA is currently in a major spat with the trump admin bc it is a politically oriented organization like so many other "professional organizations" these days. So what is the purpose of posting a link no one can read to an opinion piece headline written by an organization and author that has suffered with TDS for more then a decade. then follow by 2 worthless posts that say nothing from people who clearly couldn't read the article. Insightful but checks out for the TDS public land crowd on Rokslide and hunttalk these days. The public land lobbyist and public land crowd has lost the plot for sometime now. Can any of you "experts" explain what the public lands rule actually did?

Your post is equally if not more worthless with your blatant display of RTDS.


https://www.sltrib.com/news/environment/2025/04/17/utah-public-lands-trump-moves/

 

[Gila]

That’s the American Bar Association….Didn’t realize I was logged in sorry! I don’t think it is possible for me to provide a link to an issue that NRx cares anything about. How’s Outdoor life? Will that work for ya?

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/05/09/2024-08821/conservation-and-landscape-health

The BLM Public Lands Rule Has Been ‘Marked for Death’

The Trump Administration signaled its intentions to kill the Biden-era Public Lands Rule in an online notice Tuesday. The notice followed on the heels of an executive order that directs agencies to finalize rule changes without providing public notice or allowing for public comment.

www.yahoo.com

 

[JohnJohnson]

That’s the American Bar Association….Didn’t realize I was logged in sorry! I don’t think it is possible for me to provide a link to an issue that NRx cares anything about. How’s Outdoor life? Will that work for ya?

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/05/09/2024-08821/conservation-and-landscape-health

The BLM Public Lands Rule Has Been ‘Marked for Death’

The Trump Administration signaled its intentions to kill the Biden-era Public Lands Rule in an online notice Tuesday. The notice followed on the heels of an executive order that directs agencies to finalize rule changes without providing public notice or allowing for public comment.

www.yahoo.com

He didn't want an actual link he just wants to deflect

 

[CJ19]

Your post is equally if not more worthless with your blatant display of RTDS.


https://www.sltrib.com/news/environment/2025/04/17/utah-public-lands-trump-moves/

RTDS?

 

[HighUintas]

Reverse TDS

 

[accountantsanonymous]

Reverse TDS

 

[Jpsmith1]

This is my surprised face.

 

[displacedtexan]

this is behind a pay wall so no one can see what it says. furthermore the ADA is currently in a major spat with the trump admin bc it is a politically oriented organization like so many other "professional organizations" these days. So what is the purpose of posting a link no one can read to an opinion piece headline written by an organization and author that has suffered with TDS for more then a decade. then follow by 2 worthless posts that say nothing from people who clearly couldn't read the article. Insightful but checks out for the TDS public land crowd on Rokslide and hunttalk these days. The public land lobbyist and public land crowd has lost the plot for sometime now. Can any of you "experts" explain what the public lands rule actually did?

TDS for 2 decades? Okay.

 

[CJ19]

this rule was nothing more than pay back from the last administration to big green and big conservation for their support in the biden administrations permitting of 20 millions acres for green energy. In exchange for allowing the full scale development of our public lands, the last administration cooked this up as way to funnel tax dollars into the pockets of big conservation and big green as well as their lobbyist buddies. the rule comes out and is finalized in summer 2024 - conveniently weeks after the renewable rules public comment period close in april 2024 and the administration has committed millions of acres public land for renewables and renewable infrastructure. its disgusting I will scratch your back if you scratch mine politics of public land "conservation".

 

[Hnthrdr]

Reverse TDS

The left is painfully unoriginal…

 

[Warmsy]

Public Lands Rule | Bureau of Land Management

Español The BLM is implementing regulations that will guide balanced management of America's public lands now and for the future. The Conservation and Landscape Health Rule helps safeguard the health of our public lands for current and future generations by ensuring that we: protect clean water...

www.blm.gov

This is the first I've heard of this public land rule. Reading through the material in this link, it sounds like blm has discretion on various things, like I assume they always have. This stuff is difficult to interpret for me.

So what is actually happening in your opinion? The federal register article seems like an opinion piece to me.

How was the public land rule a benefit for us? What will be different?

 

[HighUintas]

The left is painfully unoriginal…

Not sure if that's a shot at me or him. I don't even know if RTDS is actually used by anyone. It's the first thing I could think of to describe the behavior of those who have a habit of jumping in to any political/conservative/hot button issue, screaming about TDS, slinging mud at guys who care about land conservation, and not contributing anything productive to the issue at hand

 

[Hnthrdr]

Not sure if that's a shot at me or him. I don't even know if RTDS is actually used by anyone. It's the first thing I could think of to describe the behavior of those who have a habit of jumping in to any political/conservative/hot button issue, screaming about TDS, slinging mud at guys who care about land conservation, and not contributing anything productive to the issue at hand

Not a shot at you or really him, just the general lack of thoughtfulness when coming up with a good insult for someone who is deemed a Trump fan boy. There it could be TFB

 

[HighUintas]

I'm not sure of the finer details of the rule, but the biggest thing for me was the creation of conservation and restoration leases. There could have been some downsides to it relating to energy companies putting up acres and acres of wind turbines or solar panels, but I'm not aware of any of that..

 

[Gila]

This an important aspect of the rule that the Administration wants to eliminate:

https://www.blm.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2024-10/Areas-of-Critical-Environmental-Concern-Manual-Webinar-slides-2024_0.pdf

Basically the rule is about keeping the waterways and critical habitat in tact. Without this rule extraction can take place anywhere without any regard to wildlife including fish. To this Administration, any environmental or wildlife concern is a barrier to drilling and mining.

 

[CJ19]

This an important aspect of the rule that the Administration wants to eliminate:

https://www.blm.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2024-10/Areas-of-Critical-Environmental-Concern-Manual-Webinar-slides-2024_0.pdf

Basically the rule is about keeping the waterways and critical habitat in tact. Without this rule extraction can take place anywhere without any regard to wildlife including fish. To this Administration, any environmental or wildlife concern is a barrier to drilling and mining.

so, permits and environmental regulation did not exist before this rule?