Zero feeding issues with the M&P. Shot all the plastics back to back and its controllability was noticeably better.
-J
-J
You should be good with the underwood 200s... myself and several others on the sig forum had good luck with these. The coating helps with mag binding... the pistol itself is a great pistol... the mags are the issue because they are just a mm or two too tight.I have about 75 rounds of Sig 180 FMJ through my X10. No issues yet. I did not notice much recoil with what little I've shot it. On a whim I grabbed the gen 5 G20 yesterday. I haven't shot it yet. I have some Underwood 200 Black cherry on order to see if it'll jam the Sig( according to some online). Sig feels great in the hand and comes with night sights and 2 15 round mags. Glock's supposed to super reliable and comes with 3 15 round mags. I did have to keep the sig mags loaded with 14 rounds for a little bit before I was able to get the 15th round in. And you really have to slam the fully loaded magazine to get it to seat.
Man I bet that 20mm is pretty snappy.I’m a G20 guy. Have had a Glock 20mm for about 30 years in one variation or another. I am not knocking any newer entries to the field by other manufacturers as I have not tried them.
Is the G20 stock? I only had a few failures after I had monkeyed a bunch of parts, I believe something in the slide caused a few light strikes. I'll say the stock trigger leaves a lot to be desired, but Glocks are really known for their reliability overall. Ergos, not so much.Big vote the M&P. I have a buddy who carries the 4" in the woods and as his EDC. Just swaps mags for what he's doing.
Edit: I have a M&P in 45 (not my first choice) that I once shot about 1400 rounds through without cleaning and didn't get a single malfunction.
My Glock 20 has been the least reliable 10mm.
I’ve tested the heck out of my stock G20 with HC- no problems- Zero….and a lot of friends have them.I'm just not a fan of glocks. I would never own one.
I would say my G23 is snappier than my G20 with 200g HC.Man I bet that 20mm is pretty snappy.
It was a poor attempt at a 20mm joke that didn't work.I would say my G23 is snappier than my G20 with 200g HC.
That's really good feedback! I have the FN 510 and really like it. Only two small complaints that make me want to try the X-Ten are, I'd like a slightly nicer trigger and I'd also really like a manual safety (you can buy a grip module and safety).I have/have had the following 10mms:
Glock 20 gen 4, Glock 20 gen 5, XDM 10mm, Sig P320 X-Ten, and FN 510.
Favorite = FN510
Runner up = probably Glock 20 Gen 5.
Runner, runner up, Sig X-ten
Sig is nice, but barrel heavy and not reliable with all ammo... Can't feed 220s reliably due to tight mag clearance. That said, underwood 200s have been 100% reliable. Double tap and BB 220s are a no go. Ergos are great.
Never owned an M&P 10 - known of too many with feeding issues. One shop in town refuses to sell them due to issues they ran in to.
FN510 has been 100% reliable. Has shot maybe 100 buffalo bore and underwood 220s + a couple hundred FMJ and HP varieties. Manages recoil very well, my copy had an amazing trigger, and ergos beat Glock. It's my favorite 10mm right now. Great texture and good ergos.
The Glock 20s have been reliable and are predictable but not as fun I sold my gen 4 but picked up a gen 5 which has a holosun SCS so that's fun. Gen 5 feels better than the gen 4. It's like a hammer or a saw. Does its job and is a quality tool, but not a ton of character.
Springfield - this is my wife's... It's my least favorite... This is not the elite, but the older M. Sponge trigger and I hate Springfield's lack of grip texture and looks. Has been 100% reliable tho. Ergos are decent.
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk