What is a “short distance” here? I am willing to bet on a shot timer, dialing is consistently faster at hitting vital-sized targets than holding in basically every scenario past 0.5 mil. Someone with more experience will be along to correct me I’m sure.
I can understand how it sounds quick to always follow the same procedure, and the more someone sticks to it the faster it is, but there’s no way to range a distance out to 300 yards, dial and shoot as fast as someone can simply hold and pull the trigger. It ticks off my nephew all the time when we’re shooting rocks and he points one out, brings the range finder up to eye level for a reading about the time my rifle goes Bang Bang, dead rock.
It’s not the only way to do things, but not dialing is simply a little bit faster. I’ve lost 3 animals I’d like to have on the wall by a matter of one or two seconds, so it’s been a priority most of my adult life to speed up my process as much as possible, which includes what distance the scope is set while walking around, knowing holds instinctively to 400 yards, being good enough at estimating to 300 yards to not have to range, not getting into a slower more steady position if a less steady faster position is good enough, carrying the rifle in hand as often as possible, not zooming a scope in or out, good trigger control so the first time the crosshairs are on target the gun fires, don’t use scope caps unless conditions warrant them, and holding 2 MOA on a 10 mph wind call at all distances to 300. As much time as I’ve spent fine tuning, I’d love to find extra speed somewhere and would be the first to dial if it were as fast or faster.
Even as close as a few years ago I can’t remember any of the cool kids admitting they walk around with their scope dialed to anything other than 100 yards, but now there are plenty who follow something like I do. All my scopes, even the ones that dial, are set for 300 yards. That makes it as simple as a hand width low for 100 & 200, hand width high at 350. The crazy thing is it works with any cartridge. Check out your rifle on a ballistics program - when it’s set to 300 yards, not knowing what bullet, velocity or cartridge I could use those same holds if it were a 243 or 300 PRC.
How valuable it is kind of depends on how someone hunts. There are some kinds of hunting where it’s about as exciting as watching paint dry and shots are quite predictable and not rushed. Eastman’s video of elk hunting the Red Desert is a prime example. Meat hunting in any area with tons of animals is another. Who cares if a doe or little buck walks behind a tree, another is right around the corner. But walking a ridge in western Wyoming when a big buster buck could stand up and trot off at any minute speed matters. When a bear is moving through small openings, speed matters. If a elk walks out of the timber 300 yards away, takes a look at you walking out in the open, turns around and high tails it back in, speed matters.
Nothing I say is secret or not testable. I didn’t come up with any part of it, but combined bits and pieces of what others have done before me. Someone should shoot different scenarios for themselves and see what’s faster for them. In fact it would be much more valuable for someone to shoot it themselves rather than take the word of some random dude online.
QUICK!!! Deer about 275 just paused at a ridgetop what do you dial? I drop on my butt, hold dead on and bang bang. The other thing I do at short range is round up and not get caught up in mentally splitting a hand width in half, because it doesn’t matter at that range, and it shouldn’t matter to someone working in MILs.