el_jefe_pescado
Lil-Rokslider
A question for the guys that have seen more country than I…
We moved from Colorado to Montana not too long ago and as I prepare for archery season up here I am trying to decide what sucks less...
1.High elevation mountain ranges (where your hunting is happening consistently at 9k and above) but you may have more manageable “grades” once you are in the alpine—maybe.
2. Mid elevation mountain ranges (5k-9.5k) ranges where the grades/prominence can seem can be more extreme.
3. “Lower elevation” coastal ranges. I haven’t been to Alaska but I imagine it would suck to go from sea level to 5 or 6k through a rainforest.
I’ll be curious to here everyone’s thoughts.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We moved from Colorado to Montana not too long ago and as I prepare for archery season up here I am trying to decide what sucks less...
1.High elevation mountain ranges (where your hunting is happening consistently at 9k and above) but you may have more manageable “grades” once you are in the alpine—maybe.
2. Mid elevation mountain ranges (5k-9.5k) ranges where the grades/prominence can seem can be more extreme.
3. “Lower elevation” coastal ranges. I haven’t been to Alaska but I imagine it would suck to go from sea level to 5 or 6k through a rainforest.
I’ll be curious to here everyone’s thoughts.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk