WEZ hit rates.

I just passed the shot on this buck.

IMG_4423.png

I didn’t pass the deer, I passed the shot. He was a great buck that I’d have been happy to put my tag on.

824 yards
Head on/quartering right to left wind.
Probably blowing 10-15MPH
10 minutes before dark
I just flat out did not like it at all

This would have been the hit rate, not even considering variable wind direction.
IMG_4424.png

72% chance of missing, or having a total rodeo, just before dark, with a deer a 1/2 mile away in chest high sage. No thank you lol.
 
I just passed the shot on this buck.

View attachment 968906

I didn’t pass the deer, I passed the shot. He was a great buck that I’d have been happy to put my tag on.

824 yards
Head on/quartering right to left wind.
Probably blowing 10-15MPH
10 minutes before dark
I just flat out did not like it at all

This would have been the hit rate, not even considering variable wind direction.
View attachment 968908

72% chance of missing, or having a total rodeo, just before dark, with a deer a 1/2 mile away in chest high sage. No thank you lol.
Then the next morning, I found a little better buck by chance, at a much closer distance, with calmer environmentals. No regrets on passing the shot on the first buck.

 
I just passed the shot on this buck.

View attachment 968906

I didn’t pass the deer, I passed the shot. He was a great buck that I’d have been happy to put my tag on.

824 yards
Head on/quartering right to left wind.
Probably blowing 10-15MPH
10 minutes before dark
I just flat out did not like it at all

This would have been the hit rate, not even considering variable wind direction.
View attachment 968908

72% chance of missing, or having a total rodeo, just before dark, with a deer a 1/2 mile away in chest high sage. No thank you lol.
Kudos to you for passing the shot on a great buck. No way I'd feel comfortable taking the shot at that distance in those conditions either at my current skill level.

You can probably estimate the temperature more accurately than +/- 60 deg F though to improve the hit probability unless I am reading your confidence intervals incorrectly.
 
Kudos to you for passing the shot on a great buck. No way I'd feel comfortable taking the shot at that distance in those conditions either at my current skill level.

You can probably estimate the temperature more accurately than +/- 60 deg F though to improve the hit probability unless I am reading your confidence intervals incorrectly.
Haha holy shit. I never even realized that was a VARIABLE. I thought it was a general entry. My shit it is way out of tune!! Hahaha thank you for pointing that out!
 
It turns out, that when @huntnful updated the temperature certainty to within 5 degrees, his hit probability went from 28% to 98%, and now he’s crying in his basement about the missed BOAL!


Okay I’m totally kidding
 
Haha holy shit. I never even realized that was a VARIABLE. I thought it was a general entry. My shit it is way out of tune!! Hahaha thank you for pointing that out!
I was hesitant to point it out since I've already shown multiple times in this thread that I'm not smart enough to use the WEZ correctly, but it seemed pretty far off compared to your other inputs.
 
It turns out, that when @huntnful updated the temperature certainty to within 5 degrees, his hit probability went from 28% to 98%, and now he’s crying in his basement about the missed BOAL!


Okay I’m totally kidding
Lmao 🤣. Looks like I now have 100% hit rates out to 1300 yards with 8mph wind variability. Silly me for not shooting that buck 🫠.

I was hesitant to point it out since I've already shown multiple times in this thread that I'm not smart enough to use the WEZ correctly, but it seemed pretty far off compared to your other inputs.
I appreciate it!! It did change my hit rate from 28% to 51%. That’s a little better lol.
 
Lmao 🤣. Looks like I now have 100% hit rates out to 1300 yards with 8mph wind variability. Silly me for not shooting that buck 🫠.


I appreciate it!! It did change my hit rate from 28% to 51%. That’s a little better lol.

Would think that could be more accurately reflected in DA uncertainty than temp?
 
Back
Top