Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

150 x . 7 = 105Looks like they got a lot right in this rifle but pretty expensive for what you’re getting.
Not SML rated?! And… since when has 150 grV B$209 equaled 105 grW?
The lots for years now have weighted more. The current conversion factor is closer to .801.150 x . 7 = 105
Uhh…no….lolBuy a CVA and put the rest of the money you saved in the stock market.
I'm guessing they just want to dodge any smokeless liability. It looks no different than any of the Rem clone smokeless that are already out there. Barrel shank appears plenty long as well for a smokeless application.Looks like they got a lot right in this rifle but pretty expensive for what you’re getting.
Not SML rated?! And… since when has 150 grV B$209 equaled 105 grW?
AgreedI'm guessing they just want to dodge any smokeless liability. It looks no different than any of the Rem clone smokeless that are already out there. Barrel shank appears plenty long as well for a smokeless application.
That conversation is the current information on the Hodgdon site so it's what people will use.The lots for years now have weighted more. The current conversion factor is closer to .801.
Yeah I understand that but that doesn’t make it correct…..they should have updated that years ago.That conversation is the current information on the Hodgdon site so it's what people will use.
Where is the data that states this revised conversation?Yeah I understand that but that doesn’t make it correct…..they should have updated that years ago.
They are recommending users weigh powder so why not just recommend 120 grW (which happens to be approx 150 grV with the current lots of B$209).
He’s some of my data. I’d encourage you to go collect your own. Exact results will depend on your measure and technique, but the trend is clear. It’s well documented among the serious shooters that the lots have been getting heavier per unit of volume and the .75 conversion factor is very outdated.Where is the data that states this revised conversation?