Warning Zeiss Scopes: Warranty

You're paying for the privilege of owning a product with their name on it. And that's all you're paying for.
Glass quality - not overall scope reliability, just high quality glass. They leverage their reputation with binos and spotters to sell expensive aiming devices. S&B is the exception - I am thinking more along the lines of Swaro and Zeiss scopes.
 
You just made my point. What are you paying for when you pay premium prices on the majority of European scope?

Majority of European scopes? You get excellent image quality and name. But I didn’t say anything positive about the majority of European scopes- I singled out S&B because you wrote it initially. S&B is very different than Zeiss, Swarovski, Leica, etc.
S&B what you get is in general: very solid and durable scopes, that also have excellent to world class image quality, and a product that is designed to last several decades. That’s all I was trying to get across.
 
Swaro is the only Euro worth considering anymore. That warranty tells you what a crappy company Zeiss sport optics has become. Too many excellent products nowadays anyway.
As far as I can tell Swaro has the same warranty as Zeiss for anything manufactured after 2007.

As others have stayed I don't think it's very realistic to use a scope in the field for a decade or two and not expect to pay a fair price for parts or labor. I think most companies copied the Vortex model in order to compete and sell more products.

At the end of the day I would rather pay a little to get a optic fixed than pay for a whole new optic.
 
As far as I can tell Swaro has the same warranty as Zeiss for anything manufactured after 2007.

As others have stayed I don't think it's very realistic to use a scope in the field for a decade or two and not expect to pay a fair price for parts or labor. I think most companies copied the Vortex model in order to compete and sell more products.

At the end of the day I would rather pay a little to get a optic fixed than pay for a whole new optic.
Swarovski and Zeiss shouldn't be mentioned in the same sentence together when it comes to warranty and customer service. I've never heard the stories from Swaro's CS that you hear from Zeiss fairly often.
 
Is Zeiss closing their doors soon?
Thought I heard that as well?

Sig is offering a "no fault no questions asked warranty" on electronics now. Not sure if it includes scopes, etc.

So, what's the price to fix it vs. buying a new model? Maybe get it fixed and sell it on ebay ?
 
Swarovski and Zeiss shouldn't be mentioned in the same sentence together when it comes to warranty and customer service. I've never heard the stories from Swaro's CS that you hear from Zeiss fairly often.

I can't say anything about Swarovskis CS since I've never used it. I've used Zeiss once on a pair of Binos I bought used and they were great. But I also understand that others can have different experiences.

The point I'm making is that you can't expect a better warranty on Swaro vs Zeiss on any of their newer products. Swaro may go above and beyond on what their policy is but that's not a guarantee. It sounds like Swarovski reputation is better in this aspect however.
 
I feel like this is worth speaking up about for sure. I just got a 6-36 S3 and love it. I prefer it over my Razor G3. But man, I hope I never have to pull the warranty card. I have sent probably 5 different optics back to Vortex, no questions asked and never dropped a dime. Some were even full replacements. Pick your poison I guess!
 
Back
Top