Warning about Silencer Central

[snowymtnwolf]

Scheels sold a lot of the adapters etc for what you “might” need. Give them a try. Never know.

Good luck. Doesn’t feel good to get 90% of what you need


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Gynaroo]

Hate the company all you want, but if the goal is to quiet a .223, I don't know if you can beat the Banish 223. According to Thunder Beast's 2024 Summit Sound Test, the Banish 223 was the quietest can tested on a 16-inch 5.56 AR. If there are any flaws with the can's design or construction, please let us know.

I think the Banish 30 gold actually got great scores in the Thunderbeast sound summit. Off hand I believe it was top 3. So for all the hate on SC they do have some decent suppressors that test as good as the big guys or better for some.

But I’m happy to not deal with the silly lag times on the front and back ends. But I’ve recently bought using silencer shop at the local FFL. It took silencer shop just as long to get the can to my FFL (form 3 plus shipping) as the extra time with SC. I’d still use silencer shop again. SC would have to have a screaming deal for me to cross back over. But they were able to get me to break the seal and finally buy a can so for that I’m grateful.

I have a back country. I prefer the AB warthog (a-10) over it. I’ll take the weight penalty for the warthog. I think it has a better sound and at my ear seems to be quieter.

 

[JF_Idaho]

Of you need another reason to not do business with SC....they've been caught lobbying against the Hearing Protection Act. They are trying to do a little backpedaling, but it's not looking good.

 

[RockAndSage]

Of you need another reason to not do business with SC....they've been caught lobbying against the Hearing Protection Act. They are trying to do a little backpedaling, but it's not looking good.View attachment 880393View attachment 880394

Would you mind posting this as an independent post, titled "Silencer Central Lobbying Against Removing Suppressors from NFA"?

You could also add, "Silencer Central paid $50,000 to a lobbyist to 'develop and support suppressor tax stamp conservation legislation".

It's dated 2024, but if they were doing this BS then, there's no reason to think they aren't involved now too.

 

[CHSD]

It is painful to read their efforts to cover up their lies.

 

[JF_Idaho]

Would you mind posting this as an independent post, titled "Silencer Central Lobbying Against Removing Suppressors from NFA"?

You could also add, "Silencer Central paid $50,000 to a lobbyist to 'develop and support suppressor tax stamp conservation legislation".

It's dated 2024, but if they were doing this BS then, there's no reason to think they aren't involved now too.

Will do

 

[Eastonsgrandpa]

Timely. Had no idea about this and received an email from them yesterday saying they aren't involved. I finally did receive my needed brake and the one I ordered, but only after speaking with the owner and threatening legal action. I will never even consider them again when and if I buy another can.