Bwana
WKR
I understand your response was tongue in cheek, but I think my response was valid and the idea of outsourcing manufacturing and the effect it has on Americans was brought up by another person who said this (I quoted them above): "Vortex is just another American sell-out company that makes big chunks of change at the expense of the average American."
This is by far my favorite hunting forum with the most informed, level headed people I find on any of them, but the idea that Americans are being bled dry by trade is still bandied around here as fact, when it is clearly not backed up by the economics.
I'm certainly glad you read thru my dry sarcasm, my intent wasn't to offend you
I do feel it's unfair to classify a products quality, purely based on a countries origin of manufacturing. As long as standards are adhered to, and QC is controlled by the "mother" company of high standards...quality products at a reasonable to price to the end user can be provided. China is no longer the Taiwan/Philippines mfg. of plastic trinkets and cheap shoes, they have made remarkable steps in technology and plant upgrading. They are certainly capable of great optics, just so in-house representatives are in control of QC and standards.
I don't have an issue with foreign products, including those from China or Japan. But I'm not a fan of companies that parade a front of American owned(push military/police discounts and support), purely as a marketing ploy to dismiss the fact that their products are made elsewhere/outsourced. Products should be rated/reviewed based on quality/price, instead of blindly choosing based on an American billboard waved in front of our face to block the facts.
Companies such as Leupold have managed to stay a viable source of a good product line, all while staying in the US and affordable for the masses. They may not be the best on the market, but their pricing/business structure allows for competitive pricing and marketable product....it can be done.