SamsonMan22
WKR
Sure I would be happy to have the pic rail rather than dove tail but how much better will it truly be? Nitride can be done to an existing action so unless it comes at a significant discount on their in-house action I don’t see that as a selling point.How to improve a Tikka action while still allowing the aftermarket products for Tikka’s to work…
1). Integral picatinny rail.
2). Nitride the action.
Then, one of two options-
1). More reliable, and less susceptible to environmental problems. Enclose the action and seal it as much as possible- less entry point for water, ice, and debris means less chance of failure.
Or-
2). Make it lighter from the start- open it up and reduce weight as much as possible for the 4lb sheep rifle people.
How is either of those things “bad”?
On the whole lightening the action aren’t you one of the guys who regularly advises against it? Wouldn’t they have to design a whole different action in order to make it lighter and just as good as it is now say nothing about better. At that point sure you now have a custom action modeled after a tikka lightened and improved, I’m trying to understand how it would interface with current tikka parts in this case though?
I’m really not arguing against a new and improved action, I just don’t see the need for a duplicate of a tikka action that already exists. Build bolts, they usually don’t last long in the classifieds especially 223 bolts, having an in stock ARC bolt face would be nice as well no bolt mods needed.