10 am sounds like the perfect time for a bathroom breakYep agree. I’m in the same boat. Hoping I can take a quick break tomorrow morning at work to snag the can.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
10 am sounds like the perfect time for a bathroom breakYep agree. I’m in the same boat. Hoping I can take a quick break tomorrow morning at work to snag the can.
Haha for real.10 am sounds like the perfect time for a bathroom break
Perfect timing! I'll be on lunch.

PBB actually just called me with a "Are you sure?"![]()
That's going to be wild. You should still be pushing 88 TMK's at about 2700. Which is right where my 18" 223 ai is.
I have an ace 3b @ 16” . OG 6.5 with the .75 ID fits it just right.Mine is 18" I guess I better measure
Who the **** ever made this claim? Multiple people who actually kill animals in volume every year including @Formidilosus have recommended 95 TMKs, 103Xs, and myself quite loudly for 95 SSTs over 108 Ms going back to when I joined this site years ago. However 108 Ms do kill well and have served many folks well over the years. Most can’t look past “ZOMG BC” instead of velocity and killing ability. I’m as guilty as anyone.Another would be the 108 ELDM going from unequivocally the best killing 6mm bullet to now being hit and miss or lot dependent, which I don't recall you ever distinguishing in the past. The past being before the new TMKs which you helped develop were introduced.
@hereinaz is a buddy of mine whom I’ve conversed with often and shot rifles with multiple times. He’s very knowledgeable and folks can learn from him. He’d be the first to admit he’s taking design elements from the rokstok.Another would be your Rokstock and Rokstock Lite designs and the supposed "copycat" designs from others on this forum that you criticized.
Airlock cans work in the field until they don’t anymore. It’s not hard to find their threshold for heavy field use. Sorry to burst some bubbles here.Another would be your assertions that the Airlock cans are fragile based on early testing of a flawed sample. Or that they are too high backpressure design. You just generally seem opposed to them, haven't run them through your full testing gamut, whereas you have with most if not all of the US cans.