Unknown 22OG

The bigger ID of a OTB, the more weight there is. And if you don’t increase the OD much, it’s that much less volume the reflex portion has. So when you do increase the ID and OD, your weight goes up. Hopefully this makes sense.

The OG22 is stupid quiet. It’s a 1 time run Rokslide Exclusive. Atleast that’s the plan I’ve heard over and over. I love to help but I don’t need 30 PM’s asking for more info. Haha. This is a @Ryan Avery thing to discuss.
Any chance for raw titanium rainbow finishes?
 
This one apparently isn’t a high back pressure design & doesn’t require a two layer wrap of
High speed high heat duct tape.
Muzzle forward length may be similar?
Pretty dang Quiet too . !!!
 
I would not say these numbers are definitive as these meters simply aren’t that precise. However, this can is at the supersonic crack level. That is- the super sonic crack is louder behind the gun than the muzzle report is.




16” 223, ADI 69gr SMK:

US OG22

Average 121.2 dB(A) at SE:
IMG_6932.jpeg

Average 123.7 unweighted at SE:
IMG_6933.jpeg




TBAC UL7 Gen 2

Average 127.5 dB(A) at SE:
IMG_6934.jpeg


Average 132.5 dB unweighted at SE:
IMG_6935.jpeg
 
Shut the front door. I will be in for one for certain. I assume this was tested on an AR for Pdog hunting?
 
I would not say these numbers are definitive as these meters simply aren’t that precise. However, this can is at the supersonic crack level. That is- the super sonic crack is louder behind the gun than the muzzle report is.




16” 223, ADI 69gr SMK:

US OG22

Average 121.2 dB(A):
View attachment 1090033

Average 123.7 unweighted:
View attachment 1090034




TBAC UL7 Gen 2

Average 127.5 dB(A)
View attachment 1090035


Average 132.5 dB unweighted:
View attachment 1090036
Is this what we were talking about for the 16” or a og-s in 22 concept?
 
Is the OG22 a dedicated .224 can or is the baffle aperture ID over sized enough to allow .243 through it? Separate but related, how's the back pressure on an AR?
 
I would not say these numbers are definitive as these meters simply aren’t that precise. However, this can is at the supersonic crack level. That is- the super sonic crack is louder behind the gun than the muzzle report is.




16” 223, ADI 69gr SMK:

US OG22

Average 121.2 dB(A):
View attachment 1090033

Average 123.7 unweighted:
View attachment 1090034




TBAC UL7 Gen 2

Average 127.5 dB(A)
View attachment 1090035


Average 132.5 dB unweighted:
View attachment 1090036
What did I miss? Didn’t you call out other companies for reporting similar numbers in the past with your firing pin argument? Were you the one off base all along?
 
This OG22 is what a .224 can should be, unlike
some of the others out there. Somebody took it seriously & put some thought & new technology into it.

Hope the tech made its way into the New Reaper with Reflex. Well Done !!!’
 
Might be selling a Nano with 40 rounds in it. Then buy two of these.

It's pretty neat how these companies keep out doing each other and themselves.

I think other guys mention they bought the latest and greatest at the time. Then six or seven months later a better mouse trap comes out. Kinda how the Nano sits I think. It's really not a bad can. But the OG22 is better.

Gotten to being like keeping up with computers or smart phones. Honestly I think it's even faster than that. Which for us is actually a good thing.
 
Back
Top