UM/S2H/Suppressors/Scopes and More!

The OG/OG65 on the 14.5 AR you posted. Did the suppressor(s) have any visible baffle erosion afterward?

I was assuming you did a mag dump through it like you have on other suppressor evaluations.


Oh no. Absolutely not. The OG can take anything you want to put through it- that one has done at least 3 full 180 round cyclic events- zero visible baffle or bore erosion.

The OG65 test can has 3x 90 round cyclic events without issue. The 180 round cyclic event caused slight 1st baffle erosion- still fully functional and still being used. Understand that 180 rounds cyclic (near full auto), is way beyond what almost any “hunting” can withstand without drastic damage.

The US cans made to date can be used on semi autos, even rapid fire without issue.
 
How does the 6.5 compare to the triple 6 for suppression?

The 1.5 oz weight difference isn’t that important to me.

If I could do it all over again, I would have bought a max suppression can first, weight and size be damned, as for most shooting it would not become obsolete.
 
How does the 6.5 compare to the triple 6 for suppression?

The 1.5 oz weight difference isn’t that important to me.

If I could do it all over again, I would have bought a max suppression can first, weight and size be damned, as for most shooting it would not become obsolete.


I have a Tbac Magnus that’s my least used suppressor. It’s too long and heavy for most hunting, and if I’m shooting at the range or shooting matches I’m using my Magnus K with a brake on it, as earpro dosnt matter.

The Magnus full size is cool to shoot, it’s quiet, but you still have the sonic crack, that’s loud to begin with. More than a few shots hunting I’m always wearing ear protection. So it ends up being my least used suppressor.
 
Back
Top