UM/S2H/Suppressors/Scopes and More!

[Unknown Suppressors]

I'm pretty sure if you order the can the OG is designed to be able to be bored. I know we did it for testing purposes.



The Triple 6 is
6 oz,
6" OAL (2" reflex, 4" past barrel),
6mm.

I don't know there launch timeline for it.

Ken

Was suppsed to be in the FBF sale but we weren't ready. It will be a couple weeks before we launch it unfortunately. We are working on it and will have it out as soons we/it are ready!

 

[nm.otter]

I'm pretty sure if you order the can the OG is designed to be able to be bored. I know we did it for testing purposes.

Very interesting. Mine may have a future after all (on a 338 ARC).

 

[Andouille]

The Triple 6 is
6 oz,
6" OAL (2" reflex, 4" past barrel),
6mm

I thought i heard 6.5mm CM use mentioned on the latest Shoot2Hunt podcast. I guess that wouldn't make it exactly a "triple 6."Did i hear wrong?

 

[IrkedCitizen]

I thought i heard 6.5mm CM use mentioned on the latest Shoot2Hunt podcast. I guess that wouldn't make it exactly a "triple 6."Did i hear wrong?

The OG 65 was tested with 7mm Rem Mag. They tested the Triple 6 with a 6.5cm

 

[Andouille]

The OG 65 was tested with 7mm Rem Mag. They tested the Triple 6 with a 6.5cm

That's what I thought, so its a 6-6-6.5 suppressor? I'd like something a little lighter and more compact than the OG 65 for hunting with my 6.5 CM.

 

[IrkedCitizen]

That's what I thought, so its a 6-6-6.5 suppressor? I'd like something a little lighter and more compact than the OG 65 for hunting with my 6.5 CM.

The OG65 is not recommended for 7RM even though they tested it with it. So the Triple 6 isn't recommended for the 6.5cm. But I suppose you can do what you want to do

 

[littlebigtine]

That's what I thought, so its a 6-6-6.5 suppressor? I'd like something a little lighter and more compact than the OG 65 for hunting with my 6.5 CM.

Lol an og 6.5 is 4” past the muzzle and 7.5 oz? If thats not compact enough maybe just start toting a revolver

 

[wyosam]

I'm pretty sure if you order the can the OG is designed to be able to be bored. I know we did it for testing purposes.



Ken

Sounds like an easy enough solution, but I don’t think that’s ATF compliant unless it’s done before it’s shipped and listed that way from “birth” . Pretty sure bore size is part of registration info.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[blazingangel09]

From what I can gather about the data available right now the only meaningful difference between the OG 65 and the unreleased Triple 6 is a 1.5 oz weight savings. Is there any other compelling reason to wait for the Triple 6 instead of getting the OG 65 to mount on a 6 Creedmoor? Is there an expected sound difference between the two cans?

 

[Unknown Suppressors]

Sounds like an easy enough solution, but I don’t think that’s ATF compliant unless it’s done before it’s shipped and listed that way from “birth” . Pretty sure bore size is part of registration info.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The OG isnt "designed to be bored" this is not ATF compliant. The design isn't affected strenght wise when you do bore it. We have bored several for destructive testing purposes.

 

[Unknown Suppressors]

That's what I thought, so its a 6-6-6.5 suppressor? I'd like something a little lighter and more compact than the OG 65 for hunting with my 6.5 CM.

All of our suppressors are printed at .050" over the caliber they are stated as for example this new .243 can is printed at .293. This is done to allow for moderate misalignment of muzzle threads to borea and potential undersize coming from the print. We cannot advise customers shoot bullets that are a larger caliber than what is stated on the suppressor. The OG65 is a 6.5mm .264 cal suppressor, and you should not shoot bullets through it that are larger than 6.5mm because it could damage the suppressor. Same goes for the Triple 6. The reason we are able to shoot larger calibers through our test suppressors is because we have barrels with perfect thread to bore alignment and we check it with a rod before shooting a single round through it. On top of that is very different for us to damage a suppressor than it is for a customer to!

 

[pods8 (Rugged Stitching)]

From what I can gather about the data available right now the only meaningful difference between the OG 65 and the unreleased Triple 6 is a 1.5 oz weight savings. Is there any other compelling reason to wait for the Triple 6 instead of getting the OG 65 to mount on a 6 Creedmoor? Is there an expected sound difference between the two cans?

EDIT they are both 4" in front of barrel
OG6.5 is 2" shorter (in front of the barrel), 1.5oz heaver, and as the name states can shoot 6.5 where as the triple 6 can't.

I'd assume the triple 6 would be quitter on an apples to apples 6creed or something since more baffles in front are more efficient but I don't believe anything has been posted yet.

 

[WyldGoose]

OG6.5 is 2" shorter (in front of the barrel), 1.5oz heaver, and as the name states can shoot 6.5 where as the triple 6 can't.

I'd assume the triple 6 would be quitter on an apples to apples 6creed or something since more baffles in front are more efficient but I don't believe anything has been posted yet.

I think they’re the same length in front of the barrel(4”) but the OG65 is also 4” over the barrel while the Triple6 is only 2”.

 

[IrkedCitizen]

Teratorn packs are on sale 20% off for Exo Mtn black Friday sale

 

[Schmo]

OG6.5 is 2" shorter (in front of the barrel), 1.5oz heaver, and as the name states can shoot 6.5 where as the triple 6 can't.

I'd assume the triple 6 would be quitter on an apples to apples 6creed or something since more baffles in front are more efficient but I don't believe anything has been posted yet.

Triple 6 is 4” in front of muzzle, with a 2” OTB, for a total of 6”

 

[pods8 (Rugged Stitching)]

I think they’re the same length in front of the barrel(4”) but the OG65 is also 4” over the barrel while the Triple6 is only 2”.

Triple 6 is 4” in front of muzzle, with a 2” OTB, for a total of 6”

Thanks, corrected my incorrect post above.