Two barrels, one Tikka?

The rearward thrust on 7 bc is less than brass cartridges on the magnum bolt face, I believe. I won't end up doing it unless I get an elk tag. .243 has always been fine for deer and I probably don't need the 7 BC, but am interested just to increase support for the technology. It's really going to shine in mini action action cartridges.

A little extra wallop never hurts, you never know if that was all that was needed to squeeze out another couple inches of horns as your trophy goes down!
 
Not worth it. Tikkas are cheap enough to just buy two barreled actions and use pic rings.
OP, I was thinking this might accomplish the goal a little better and was gonna recommend this. That way you still only have one stock and one scope, the only redundancy you'll have is the action and the pic rail.
 
OP, I was thinking this might accomplish the goal a little better and was gonna recommend this. That way you still only have one stock and one scope, the only redundancy you'll have is the action and the pic rail.
I do like the idea.

My question for you and @atmat is, do I need to use pic rings vs UM tikka rings?
 
I do like the idea.

My question for you and @atmat is, do I need to use pic rings vs UM tikka rings?
UM rings are not bad to move back and forth, though moving a threaded recoil pin is annoying.

Pic rings are easier, especially is used something like NF UL rings, but there is a significant cost difference. UM rings $130. Area 419 rail $80 and NF UL rings $180. So $130 more.

If using the threaded recoil pins, just see if UM will send some extras.
 
You wouldn’t have to re-level with the UM so long as you don’t take it out of the rings.
True I didn't even think about the dovetail really. I guess there'd be no issues with torquing them after installed since the bottom appears to be independent. It'd only be interchangeable with other Tikka actions though, with a pic rail it'd be interchangeable with anything else as well.
 
Back
Top