Trophy bull and a trespass charge

So how to they "maximize revenue" off state lands if they can't lease (or sell) to anyone that isn't an adjoining property owner? Seems flawed...

We're are applying 2025 logic to something that was created in 1890. The west was way different back then.
They can lease or sell to anyone, but nobody but the adjoining LO is going enter into one of those deals unless an adjoining LO provides access. I'd guess that's what happens when mining on state land.
 
Read it again. It also includes "to aid in taking game". Traveling into an area definitely falls under the "aid in taking game" to me.

“Nothing in this Section shall apply to the operation of an aircraft in a usual manner where there is no attempt or intent to locate any game animal, such as aircraft used for the sole purpose of passenger transport.”

Traveling into an area falls under passenger transport.
 
We're are applying 2025 logic to something that was created in 1890. The west was way different back then.
They can lease or sell to anyone, but nobody but the adjoining LO is going enter into one of those deals unless an adjoining LO provides access. I'd guess that's what happens when mining on state land.
I suspect it was way different in the sense a law owner wouldn't have to gall to block another landowner from having access to their property. I feel like this is likely a newer phenomenon.
 
There were cases of landowners shooting other landowners over water access and grazing range back in the day. There were huge ranches amassed by homesteaders being, “bought out” and never heard from again.

People have always been people and some of them have always sucked.
 
Back
Top