gmajor
WKR
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2014
- Messages
- 609
Looking for a set of tripod binoculars (on my budget...). I had assumed I would go with the Vulture HD 15s, but now I'm thinking about the diamondback 12s.
The 15s give you 3x more magnification, which is certainly not trivial. However, the 12s save a lot of weight. As a meat hunter for the forseeable future (I'm not trying to count points or rings), I don't use a spotting scope. I just want to be able to find game in the high country (CO, CA, ID). So far I've just been carrying the diamondback 8x42s, but I've seen first hand the advantage of a higher-power tripod bino, and I think it might be time to add one to the mix.
My concerns over the 15s are primarily weight, but then I worry getting the 12s won't give me as much of a bump in power as I would hope for over the 8s (were they to be on a tripod). Also, if you had a pair of 8 and 12s, would you carry them both or just the 12s?
Back and forth, back and forth...anybody care to chime in?
The 15s give you 3x more magnification, which is certainly not trivial. However, the 12s save a lot of weight. As a meat hunter for the forseeable future (I'm not trying to count points or rings), I don't use a spotting scope. I just want to be able to find game in the high country (CO, CA, ID). So far I've just been carrying the diamondback 8x42s, but I've seen first hand the advantage of a higher-power tripod bino, and I think it might be time to add one to the mix.
My concerns over the 15s are primarily weight, but then I worry getting the 12s won't give me as much of a bump in power as I would hope for over the 8s (were they to be on a tripod). Also, if you had a pair of 8 and 12s, would you carry them both or just the 12s?
Back and forth, back and forth...anybody care to chime in?
Last edited: