The crossing state lines part is what gives the Federal Government the right to regulate it.I'm certainly no expert at all, but its my understanding that they want to run a test program where people would pay their road use tax based off of mileage they drove rather than paying for that at the gas pump.
Electric cars cause the same wear and tear to the road as the other cars out there, but pay no road use tax because they aren't filling up with gas, so I guess it kinda makes sense?
No idea what crossing state lines has to do with it, but maybe its kind of like how commercial vehicles have to report their miles in each state..
Yearly vehicle inspections. NC has done it for a long time. We have to take our vehicle's to an authorized shop every year before we can get our yearly tag stickers. More taxes, taxes, taxes...How are they going to know how many miles you drove?
Are they going to make you get a cell phone?App on your cell phone. It will be in concert with your insurance company. The more you drive, the higher risk you are. For your own good, you will need to have your mileage tracked so you pay the right amount of insurance and carbon credits.
this will make things more equitable.
There will be a sliding scale though and the more your report on your taxes, the higher your rates.
this will make things more equitable.
you will be asked to contribute a potion (don’t worry, only a few cents on the dollar) to a fund that will go to historically oppressed populations to help pay for their insurance and carbons credits, and maybe even get them in a more fuel efficient car.
this will make things more equitable
Do I have to go on?
Are they going to make you get a cell phone?
Do I have to go on...
They won't need to. They can tie into auto insurance. I get a questionnaire every year or so asking for current mileage of our vehicles. The rates are based partially on how much you drive. Vehicle inspections, smog inspections, DMV requirements, are all easy ways to get what they want.Are they going to make you get a cell phone?
Do I have to go on...
Oh, they will find a way...perhaps taxing electricity even more so than it already is...funny how the EV's use of rare earth minerals (also mined) coupled with the Electrical grid (ran largely on coal) is somehow seen as preferable but to think the mafia, I mean the government, isn't going to get their vig is short-sighted.Thinking out loud, here. With the decided push to convert to EVs over the next 10 years and, from an observation standpoint, we seem to be trending already as I’m seeing Teslas on an increasing basis, EV stocks are looking increasingly productive, and the technology is making leaps and bounds, what is to replace the eventual decreasing revenue from fuel taxes to maintain roads and highway infrastructure?
It seems apparent that demand for travel and transportation will only increase, thus creating more demand for higher quality roads and infrastructure, particularly with the advent of self driving vehicles, particularly trucks. Since EVs can be/will be charged at home for at least a significant percentage of use, there is no practical way to parse that energy consumption out from other usage to direct to road funding. If the prevailing sentiment is to rule out mileage tax, what is the proposed substitute to replace fuel taxes in a reality where fuel will face declining demand?
Oh, they will find a way...perhaps taxing electricity even more so than it already is...funny how the EV's use of rare earth minerals (also mined) coupled with the Electrical grid (ran largely on coal) is somehow seen as preferable but to think the mafia, I mean the government, isn't going to get their vig is short-sighted.
Cause MORE wear and tear on the road. Heavier vehicles with the weight of batteries added and more torque. Should be charging more for EVs to cover costs instead of giving them a tax break to buy them.Electric cars cause the same wear and tear to the road as the other cars out there, but pay no road use tax because they aren't filling up with gas, so I guess it kinda makes sense?
your car very likely already has a GPS
The spending bill just passed has proposed language to require passive (think about that one for a second) system to check your blood/alcohol level.
need I continue?
How much more evidence do you need to know you are being nudged into a very tight corner?