This is pretty much where I stand. There has to be some limit on technology for our own good. We are constantly pushing the hunt out of hunting.I think a middle ground is banning real-time camera's and banning them during hunting season.
I keep seeing guys saying stuff like this.This is pretty much where I stand. There has to be some limit on technology for our own good. We are constantly pushing the hunt out of hunting.
I agree that private ground is going to get tricky and I hope that wardens are honest, the same way that I hope sportsmen are honest. If you normally run cameras to watch your ground, I would give the warden in your area a call and explain why you have cameras set up. 10 minutes of time on your end would probably go along ways.Sure that's what they said. I am just asking who gets to decide if your camera is there to "take wildlife" or to watch your property/ag fields? I also know that the burdon of proof should be on the division, but how does that saying go...you can beat the rap but can't beat the ride...I would bet money that if your trail cameras are up along the borders of BLM lands (like mine are) and a warden sees them, they are going to start walking around your property using their probable cause to do whatever they want and it will be their mind reading ability that is going to tell them if someone set the cameras up to watch game or watch for people. I don't have a problem with this rule on public land. Private is a whole different thing.
Seen the same thing happen with trail cameras. Most states have laws on the books that leaving a stand/blind does not reserve the spot for you. I find stands all over the place and have sat many water holes with peoples stands on them. I actually feel kind of bad for a guys camera that I sat in front of for about 6 nights this last year. That dude has got to have a lot of pictures of me.One comment I have in addition, I find treestands left up over a water hole all season more bothersome then a trailcam.
To me a trailcam is someone getting a feel for the area, where a tree stand is like some one trying to mark "their territory"
I keep seeing guys saying stuff like this.
They use OnX, Go Hunt, cell phone, gps, in-reach, range finders, flashlights, video recorders, scopes on rifles, compound bows & xbows, binoculars, spotting scopes, etc. And a game camera is a big deal.
I'm surprised at the number of guys against cell cams.
With that sentiment, I'd really like to see a rule that says no electronic devices can be used in conjunction with hunting. Nothing that uses a battery (even a solar-powered light in camp for the back-country camp out hunters). Let the men be men and the other dudes whine & cry about it.
I suppose that is true for some who put up trail cams. With that said I have had mostly good encounters with the folks with the trail cams and mostly bad with the tree stand guys when they show up and I'm on "their hole".Seen the same thing happen with trail cameras. Most states have laws on the books that leaving a stand/blind does not reserve the spot for you. I find stands all over the place and have sat many water holes with peoples stands on them. I actually feel kind of bad for a guys camera that I sat in front of for about 6 nights this last year. That dude has got to have a lot of pictures of me.
Harvest rate will be hard to see a difference. In order for harvest rate to decrease people will have to go home empty handed. There has been plenty of arguments made that "cameras make people hold out for animals because they know a big one is in the area." My opinion is that anyone that holds out because they have a bigger deer on camera is most likely to hold out period. Most people set a line and shoot the first thing over that line. Harvest rates dont take into account animal size but in my opinion, a dead deer is a dead deer. A two point isnt worth any less than a four point.To play devils advocate and out of curiosity, how much do you guys think trail cams play in harvest rate? How much do you think it compares to usage of ONX hunt maps, GoHunt, etc....
That is more indicative of the person than whether they use cameras or stands. I personally would say I have ran into the opposite but thats from a pretty low sample size.I suppose that is true for some who put up trail cams. With that said I have had mostly good encounters with the folks with the trail cams and mostly bad with the tree stand guys when they show up and I'm on "their hole".
The trail cam guys knew I might be there and were accepting that I got there first.... not so much for the tree stand guys.
There are assholes of all forms and beliefs not just one.
I guess that's what I meant by assholes comment. There are good people and bad people on every side of things. I don't think banning one or the other is going to fix anything. People are still going to put up cameras even if its banned. Look at Colorado Shed hunting.... every year certain guys are walking out with piles of sheds at 6am May 1st.That is more indicative of the person than whether they use cameras or stands. I personally would say I have ran into the opposite but thats from a pretty low sample size.
Well, I don’t use Go Hunt, In Reach, video recorders, Compound bows, and Xbows. Like I said I believe at some point there should be a limit on the technology we use.I keep seeing guys saying stuff like this.
They use OnX, Go Hunt, cell phone, gps, in-reach, range finders, flashlights, video recorders, scopes on rifles, compound bows & xbows, binoculars, spotting scopes, etc. And a game camera is a big deal.
I'm surprised at the number of guys against cell cams.
With that sentiment, I'd really like to see a rule that says no electronic devices can be used in conjunction with hunting. Nothing that uses a battery (even a solar-powered light in camp for the back-country camp out hunters). Let the men be men and the other dudes whine & cry about it.