SchwarzStock
Lil-Rokslider
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2024
- Messages
- 107
Are traditional muzzleloader shooters to timid to stand up for themselves? I ask this after many years of hearing the so-called "traditional archers" wail about crossbows. The archers are whine about the trigger and sights of a crossbow while not acknowledging they use the same things with their compounds. I would say with the reduced range of a crossbow and rainbow trajectory the crossbow is not of advantage so there should be no more restrictions on their use for hunting than the compound.
Back to the muzzleloaders; traditional vs inlines. It is obvious to anyone with their eyes open the two groups are vastly different. The tradional guys have to contend with all the limitations of the guns in use 100+ years ago while with the exception of the ignition the inlines with modern scopes and added gadgetry bare faint resemblance to a flint or percussion rifle of the 1850's. We traditional gun shooters look down our nose at the inlines, as well we should, but no one to my knowledge is whining we need to take an individual's right to hunt with the rifle of their choice like the archers are. Do we as traditional rifle shooters need to become more vocal and scream for new restrictions on the inline guys?
Back to the muzzleloaders; traditional vs inlines. It is obvious to anyone with their eyes open the two groups are vastly different. The tradional guys have to contend with all the limitations of the guns in use 100+ years ago while with the exception of the ignition the inlines with modern scopes and added gadgetry bare faint resemblance to a flint or percussion rifle of the 1850's. We traditional gun shooters look down our nose at the inlines, as well we should, but no one to my knowledge is whining we need to take an individual's right to hunt with the rifle of their choice like the archers are. Do we as traditional rifle shooters need to become more vocal and scream for new restrictions on the inline guys?