Functonally Its kind of same\same when youre talking about a full bedding block—around that, its just the shape of the stock. Sounds like you are more concerned with aesthetics, but the shape is also functional. I guess Id personally probably consider other factors in picking a stock, ie am I shooting prone mostly versus offhand mostly, etc, finished weight target, optic height, etc and choose between those or get other options based on those criteria. Ultimately if you choose based on looks and its not as good a fit for use, you wont be happy.That could be. My understanding of a chassis stock, are a larger aluminum “frame”, inside a squared-off, blocky looking benchrest kind of thing. This is a hunting rifle and I prefer a more traditional looking stock for that.
I like the looks of the B&C, but have not seen one in person. That aluminum recoil lug will probably be the deal-breaker for me. This would be on a .30-06, with a second possibly going on a .300 WM.
To me, I thought the B&C had an aluminum, full bedding block. Is that considered a chassis?
Thanks for the info.
Is the UPR stock a laminate like fiberglass or carbon, or is it a molded plastic like a souped-up t3x lite or ctr stock? Or something else?