Tikka T3x Stock Replacement - UPR vs B&C

[Plaz]

Am wanting to replace the stock on a T3x CTR. Trying to decide between a UPR takeoff stock or a B&C. Would the UPR stock be better than a B&C stock? Or, visa-versa?

By the way, not interested in a KRG, MDT, etc. Don’t want a chassis.

Thanks.

 

[Plaz]

Also, how do the HS Precisions stocks compare to these two?

Thanks again.

 

[matthewmt]

IMO, if the UPR stock is less I would opt for that.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

 

[wind gypsy]

I don’t see how a KRG bravo or echo is any less a “stock” than the UPR stock. UPR looks decent but never used one. I do really like the bravos.

 

[Plaz]

I don’t see how a KRG bravo or echo is any less a “stock” than the UPR stock. UPR looks decent but never used one. I do really like the bravos.

Not saying the UPR is a better stock than the Bravo. Just saying I don’t want a chassis.

 

[Fightswithbadgers]

Also, how do the HS Precisions stocks compare to these two?

Thanks again.

I have always felt that HS precision is a better quality stock than what B&C produces. That being said I own 2 B&C stocks and they are definitely an upgrade from a stock tikka.

 

[T28w]

Have you looked at the echo? They appear extremely similar to upr stock. echo uses factory tikka mags also.

 

[Fightswithbadgers]

Sorry I haven’t, I’ll do some research!

 

[wind gypsy]

Not saying the UPR is a better stock than the Bravo. Just saying I don’t want a chassis.

What is your distinction between chassis and stock?

 

[Plaz]

I read that the B&C stock has an integrated recoil lug in its’ aluminum bedding block. That’s concerning. I wouldn’t think an aluminum recoil lug would stand up to the recoil over time.

 

[Macintosh]

i think your definition of a chassis is suspect. A chassis is simply a machined metal inlet that the action sits into, example manners stocks with a mini-chassis. The b&c is a mini chassis with a sporter stock built around it, just like the manners. A bravo is more or less the exact same thing with a more adjustable/modular stock built around it, like a half-way point between a stock and a full-on chassis such as a MPA or MDT chassis like you see on a lot of PRS rifles. Aside from weight and “squareness”, much of the difference is at least in large part cosmetic. Someone will get their underwear in a bunch over that, there are legit functional differences due to the shape, but often favoring the chassis over the stock. Regardless, It doesnt sound like a chassis per se is what you dont want, what exactly is it that you dont like about a chassis? That might help focus replies on what youre looking for.

The krg echo might be one to check out—it’ll be like a sporterized version of a bravo.
Re the b&c recoil lug. How much will this gun get shot? What cartridge is it?

 

[General RE LEE]

UPR fits my needs perfectly. I really like the stock for its function and simplicity.

 

[sdupontjr]

OR, just stick it in a regular tikka stock. Love mine.

 

[schweinstein]

Gonna piggyback on this thread if OP doesn’t mind. I just got my first tikka but had already bought a Bravo from the classifieds. The factory sporter barrel looks dumb on the bravo imho. It’s like 1.5 inches or more floating above the stock.

Anyone know what chassis are out there that look good or are more designed for sporter profile?

 

[Tmac]

I read that the B&C stock has an integrated recoil lug in its’ aluminum bedding block. That’s concerning. I wouldn’t think an aluminum recoil lug would stand up to the recoil over time.

It does. I have one and if you make sure you get it set in properly, it works well. I suspect a skim bedding job would alleviate your concern. If there is no “slop” it should stand up fine. The original T3 floating recoil lug was aluminum. It could and at times did indent from recoil, I had it happen.