The All New MRC/S2H Marshall Rifle Now Available

[Formidilosus]

Interesting marketing.

What?

Normally you are pretty logical in posts. But I am lost as to what you are talking about here.

 

[Carl Ross]

Interesting marketing.

I'm pretty sure that's just a default output of the software the electronic target system uses, not anything any marketers came up with.

 

[NSI]

I very much understand what matters. However, what they have chosen to emphasize, with large bold font, is not the group size, but “”100-10X”.

View attachment 838151

I don't think it's rational for anybody over there to write custom software or output configs. They've been clear with what they're measuring, and it's shown on this output. Moving on...

-J

 

[Grumman]

If it explicitly said it I missed it, but do they come with the test target?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[dieselchessy]

What is over the top about the “marketing”?

The “ultra-accurate” button rifled barrel seems the most glaring.
The innovators in “adaptive controlled round feed” is another in my view. The only innovation I can tell is adding the word adaptive.

Less obvious is the inclusion of marketing fluff in the description and an almost total lack of actual information like barrel length, twist rate, trigger pull weight adjust range, length of pull, weight of rifle, muzzle threading, ect…
Not to mention the details discerning buyers would like to know like throat length/geometry, magazine length, barrel air gauge specs, rifling style, what bullets and seating depths were used for the 100 rd cycle test, ect…

The product page doesnt even look to have a “Specs” tab.

Im not a potential buyer so not one to spend energy on.

 

[Bluumoon]

First two rifles came in today. For now the questions or comments can be in here.

See this thread for updates on the rifles-

Montana Rifle Company Marshall Field Evaluations

The first two production* versions of the MRC/S2H Marshall rifle were received today. There will be three more rifles being sent to be used heavily by forum members. Pulled straight out of the box and mounted the scope. This will be the first rifle in 20+ years that I haven’t torn...

rokslide.com

View attachment 838111

Looks good, curious how the cerakote holds up to the typical white glove treatment you provide.

 

[Formidilosus]

Looks good, curious how the cerakote holds up to the typical white glove treatment you provide.

Stock or barrel?

 

[Bluumoon]

Stock or barrel?

I would assume stock cerakote won’t hold up under hard use, barrel/action riding under and around your other gear from what I saw would be telling.

 

[mxgsfmdpx]

Looks good, curious how the cerakote holds up to the typical white glove treatment you provide.

Cerakote on carbon wears as expected. Properly applied cerakote on a stainless barrel lasts longer than a barrel lives (in most chamberings).

 

[Formidilosus]

I would assume stock cerakote won’t hold up under hard use, barrel/action riding under and around your other gear from what I saw would be telling.

There are pics in the MRC Junction thread- that 308 barrel was coated as well.

 

[NE Herd Bull]

Well I caved to the pressure
I put my name in-line for a 22 Creed

Hits all of the boxes of what I think MY hunting rifle should be.

 

[Wiscgunner]

Seeing as AICS magazines are designed for Push Feed actions, will the factory magazines be getting the feed lips shortened to utilize the CRF feature of the bolt? Or will I need to do that when I get the rifle home.

This is a common problem I ran into when ARC and Bighorn started to offer CRF actions intended to be used with push feed magazines. The long lips of the push feed magazine prevent the bolt face from picking up the next cartridge because it is pressed up by the neck of the one below it instead of being released sooner and being pressed up higher by the shoulder. Simple fix that makes these actions actually CRF in real life. This is one of the reasons Ted came out which his own magazine that coincidently had shorter lips than AI Magazines.

Also if the action a flat bottom clone or a round bottom bastard copy of a Win 70? I assume flat bottom but want to make sure. Thanks for helping bringing another cool project to market