The problem with that is it doesn't drive any innovation. We can all agree NG isn't a forever answer, I'll agree there is a better allocation, might not/probably isn't wind, but doubling down on NG won't be driving a better solution. What happens when there's a NG shortage? You put more money into a single source solution, you're going to be that much further behind when that source goes down.
I feel like fossil fuel is another short sighted answer. It works for now, and I think there's lots of areas where ff's won't be replaced, but I think finding alternative ways to make energy, and using things differently to not consume energy off of a main grid to reduce demand will further everything.
I look at the fuel in this country as a savings account/trust fund. The slower we are burning through them the better off we will be. Save it for the future.
I'm not sold on nuclear for the waste, maybe we can make improvements. But also given that nobody prepared for what would happen with the plants and cold weather, I don't know how well they will prepare a nuclear plant either.
I'm not in the energy industry in anyway. I'm just a dumb redneck, my perspective might not be worth too much, just how things make sense to me. Evolve or die, that's a moto in business, but it carries over to a lot of things.