TENET Q/A

[Huntnpack 2]

For those interested Tenet has SE numbers listed on their site. Barrel lengths & ammo used included.

 

[Ucsdryder]

That's a bs answer. They came up with their own criteria that heavily weights the features of their products in a deceptive way.

For example the tenet 6.5 limited is a louder, longer, and heavier suppressor than the zero gravity 6.5. it did better in the recoil test but that's it! How was it the best suppressor in the test?!?!

If recoil reduction is the only thing that matters a muzzle brake would have done really well in this test.

Your cookie analogy is a construct for people who can't read.

View attachment 1080335View attachment 1080336View attachment 1080337

Now I’m confused. If you add up the equation they listed above, are their numbers correct? If so, where’s the deception? They gave you the answer to the test and showed their work. That would make any math teacher proud.

 

[2buffalo]

It doesn't give shooters ear with a brake unless I am missing it.

 

[Sundodger]

It doesn't give shooters ear with a brake unless I am missing it.

They finally added it to their website, 129 db at shooters ear for the limited 7 suppressor. Add 8 db for the 1 port or 9 db for the 2 port.

 

[1000yards]

They finally added it to their website, 129 db at shooters ear for the limited 7 suppressor. Add 8 db for the 1 port or 9 db for the 2 port.

So all that hyped up recoil reduction comes at the expense of sound suppression like every other suppressor / muzzle device ever made?

I'm shocked...

 

[Salmon River Solutions]

Y'all take stuff too seriously. I'm a marketing expert. The stuff you can do in Microsoft Paint is amazing.

Prove my claims wrong.

 

[Dioni A]

How is it deceptive when they give you the exact equation they used at the top of rankings? Using aggregate score they do place better than the rest. I understand what you’re saying, but it’s not like the company is trying to trick you lol.

A few things, The weight in that test is not the production weight of the can you're going to get. The scoring metric as a whole makes no sense. If they'd have tested a two-port titanium muzzle brake it would have scored better than some of the suppressors in the test. Finally they're adding a logarithmic number. That's not how the DB scale works, it's non linear.

None of this is to say that that might not be a great suppressor. Just that they hijacked the test then represented the information as though it was outdoor lifes. Published non-production numbers of what seem to be prototypes that are 20% lighter and came up with a scoring criteria dictating how you're supposed to appreciate four different units of measurement.