TENET Q/A

View attachment 1080192

Is this outdoor lifes scoring criteria or tenants that they very misleadingly put in an email with no claim that it's theirs but not found in the actual articles? I'm asking a question on my original post because I'm not a thousand percent sure. But Im certain you're at least some degree wrong in your response.

That is a combined score of all things tested. The OL article published the quietest, lightest, most recoil reduction, etc. but when you tallied up all the things measured from their raw data that is available to the public that is how the cookie crumbled. Weight, length, sound reduction, recoil reduction.

You can do the math for yourself with the readily available data that was collected and published by OL.
 
Do you work for Tenet? You posted an extremely long response referring to the “team at Tenet” but then used “we” here as if you are speaking on their behalf officially.

I don’t necessarily care either way I just think it’s something you should be clear about if you are speaking for yourself or for the company.
I will likely be working for Tenet in the very near future. I was a skeptic and when I got my hands on the product I was so impressed I asked for a job 😆
 
@Dioni A
I received that email and went back through Outdoor Life's data looking for the correlation or a similar ranking. What was interesting, is that OL specifically writes a disclaimer to disregard any aggregates or individual company's usage of their compiled data. Basically saying, here is our test results, we can't control what these companies do with the data, readers beware.

Tenet did exactly that and made an aggregate and ranked them themselves. It is misleading. That said, I don't think Tenet created their own results or skewed the data. They were likely excited about the results and found a even more flattering way to present them.

I'm excited about Tenet as well. I may order when they become available again. It's certainly not uncommon for new product introductions in this industry to have start up issues.
 
That is a combined score of all things tested. The OL article published the quietest, lightest, most recoil reduction, etc. but when you tallied up all the things measured from their raw data that is available to the public that is how the cookie crumbled. Weight, length, sound reduction, recoil reduction.

You can do the math for yourself with the readily available data that was collected and published by OL.
That's a bs answer. They came up with their own criteria that heavily weights the features of their products in a deceptive way.

For example the tenet 6.5 limited is a louder, longer, and heavier suppressor than the zero gravity 6.5. it did better in the recoil test but that's it! How was it the best suppressor in the test?!?!

If recoil reduction is the only thing that matters a muzzle brake would have done really well in this test.

Your cookie analogy is a construct for people who can't read.

Screenshot_20260614_062827_Gallery.jpgScreenshot_20260614_062316_Chrome.jpgScreenshot_20260614_062304_Chrome.jpg
 
That's a bs answer. They came up with their own criteria that heavily weights the features of their products in a deceptive way.

Indeed. That was my immediate take on it as well.

I may need to amend my previous request for a shovel. I think we might need a Greek hero and a river to get all the bs out of here. Unfortunately, I don’t think Dioni is Greek…
 
Back
Top