Completely agree. I’ve got the 5-27 and the 4-20. The ZCO’s are excellent
I appreciate the feedback, I was also considering the ZCO as well. But figured if jumping to that price it may be worth going with the TT.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And if you actually read that eval with an open mind you would see he said it's a sample size of exactly one and is statistically irrelevant until others are tested.I’ve actually owned and used both. So obviously take it with a grain of salt from an internet stranger, but as a stranger with actual experience. I got rid of the 4-16 ATACR fairly quick. I still have the TT315M. I’ve had zero issues mechanically, and the Tangent is superb optically. The Tangent is superior to the ATACR in every way.
This season, my Tangent bounced around in my truck for hundreds (plural) of miles on washboard gravel and hundreds (plural) of miles on unmaintained two tracks.
Here’s the last 5 round group before season (factory ammo, from a light-ish weight magnum)
View attachment 376590
Here’s the first 5-round group after season
View attachment 376591
Here’s a link to seven (7) 3-shot groups, shot on different days, with the suppressor taken on and off in between. My 20+ pound range bag regularly slides off my back seat directly onto whatever optic is on the gun(s) I’m taking. Nothing I’d claim as a tEsT, but people around here might think so, LOL.
https://www.rokslide.com/forums/threads/suppressor-question.231410/post-2251042
The “eval” referred to above is entertaining, but that’s about it. Notice someone else drop tested a tangent at the end of that thread but was told it wasn’t dropped right. Someone else said their ATACR lost zero, and was told they were wrong. The data in the thread does not backup statements made. It’s kinda a mess honestly, but some are into it.