SWFA 3-9 question - no parallax adjustment, issue or no?

[HandgunHTR]

For those of you who have experience with the SWFA 3-9X42, have you found that the lack of a parallax adjustment is an issue or not?

I am contemplating picking one up to put on my shorty Encore. It is an Encore with a 17" 7-08 barrel on it. With my current load of Varget under a 120 grain NBT, it is good to right at 500 yards. As all of the other rifles that I shoot past 300 yards all have parallax adjustments and I dial it right after I dial for elevation, so I can't say that I have had an issue with parallax since I started shooting longer ranges.
My gut tells me that I should be fine, but I am also starting to shoot from "field positions" more and that leads to not being "perfectly behind" the gun at times.

Anyway, just looking for input one way or another.

 

[Braaap]

Non issue. I have 3 of them, great scope!

 

[NWBLKTAIL]

Non issue. I have 3 of them, great scope!

2nd this I have 2

 

[Ajsomp]

you’re fine. The Swfa lack of parallax hasn’t ever cost me an animal. Just takes some extra a Even with scopes with adjustable parallax, when hunting I set it normally to 300 and don’t think about it again.

Solid scope for any rifle

 

[WBT]

Not an issue in my experience as well.

 

[HandgunHTR]

Thank you, gents. I will get one ordered up and prepare for another round of "musical scopes" in the gun room.

 

[Steve300xcw]

Order 2