mudslinger021485
FNG
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2025
- Messages
- 64
THISAppreciate the tests and data. Thanks for doing this. Ryan, your humility shows. Thanks again
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
THISAppreciate the tests and data. Thanks for doing this. Ryan, your humility shows. Thanks again
I don’t know how it works. I haven’t used, or been around the non professional level systems really until a year or two ago.
But, it is VERY obvious with all bystanders that randomly a known, extremely consistent can meters 136-137 dB- that there is no way is real, given that same shot sounds to everyone exactly the same as the ones metering 129 dB.
For instance, it is not unusual to have the TBAC UL7 Gen 2 to randomly pop a 135-137 dB(A) on a 20” 223. That isn’t real. Not at all. That never shows up in real systems. Not only that- frequently two, calibrated identical Spartan meters don’t read the same when it happens.
I’m saying that absolutely cans meter different in different conditions. And it is frequently a 3-4 dB range up and down.
I am not saying it is a huge difference when metering with correct systems; I am saying that it is with the meters that almost everyone is using.
I am stupid on this; are you saying environmental conditions don’t cause variability in testing suppressors?
Sure. Recall what I actually wrote- we can quote it if you want in its entirety in case I am mistaken. IIRC- what I stated was that A weighting is what the entire industry uses, and not being a professional sound person- that from what I have been told, it is fine for this use because we don’t actually know what is “safe” and “not safe”- the unknown is so large that as long as you are comfortably under 140, it’s probably about as fine as you will get. Also remember, that I started showing the Z-weighting afterwards.
You disagree with that- awesome. Can you tell me how and why, and how I can functionally use that information? How do I compare one can that only has A-weighting listed, with another can that uses Z-weighting?
Not any of that has to do with whether the meters being used are accurate enough to pick up the difference in 1-2 dB.
FFS you have people on here claiming that cans are metering in the 120’s on right side ear from an AR15…. And everything is good because “that’s what the meter says”.
100%. I am ignorant as can be. Can you or omicron educate and teach me where and how 2dB difference (129 to 131 say) is changing how I use a can, or what steps I must take to remove the risk increase?
The second video is up. I was solo on this test, so bear with me.
One weird thing, watch the meter hit 150 dBs after the last shot of the last suppressor.
One weird thing, watch the meter hit 150 dBs after the last shot of the last suppressor.
I may have missed it but why was the 6.5 reaper and airlock not included in the last test?
I'm not buying that bs excuse.Because he was shooting 308.
I'm not buying that bs excuse.
More like purposely omitting the results of firing a 308 through a 6.5 can because he's trying to hide the truth!He is testing 30 cal cans against 30 cal cans on a .308. That's how it's done with PEW Science and Silencer Summit. lol
I thought you were serious for a moment. hahahMore like purposely omitting the results of firing a 308 through a 6.5 can because he's trying to hide the truth!
you'll never know if titanium baffle wipes work if you don't try it!More like purposely omitting the results of firing a 308 through a 6.5 can because he's trying to hide the truth!
you just get trimmed bullets, the problem is the pieces of copper jackets in the can causing obstructions haha we tried it for science a few timesyou'll never know if titanium baffle wipes work if you don't try it!