Suppressor test parameter argument thread

You really need to change your test parameters on if this is a good Sunday or not. Without comparing this Sunday with all the other Sundays, your data is really useless.
 
What are your qualifications to determine differences between a dude and a chick. In what strict set of standards are you using to make that determination!?!?!

You do realize what the UCS part stands for, right?

I'd say say its like sticking your head up a bull's ass, but can just take the butchers word.
 
No, what you said was this Sunday is off to a good start. Which is different than saying this Sunday could potentially meter as a good Sunday. I can see you’re way over your head here.
 
If you don't recognize this as fact we can't even have a conversation. Uneducated people like to think that Sunday is the end of the week but every week starts on a Sunday. Look at a calendar!!!
Change My Mind 29032026101906.jpg
 
Damn. I thought this would be a legitimate thread to ask people to explain why they think the SAAMI suppressor testing specifications are wrong.
 
Ok I’ll start.

If you choose as$ over tiddies, you’re gay, cuz dudes have as$es too.
This is functionally incorrect. In novel field conditions in broken terrain as$ beats out tiddies every time. Try going near cyclic on a tiddies and see how that works out. Poor gal is gonna have hearing loss and a TBI. The as$ can handle the destructive nature of such a test.
 
This is functionally incorrect. In novel field conditions in broken terrain as$ beats out tiddies every time. Try going near cyclic on a tiddies and see how that works out. Poor gal is gonna have hearing loss and a TBI. The as$ can handle the destructive nature of such a test.
Just to clarify, this is really only true from field positions, on demand.
 
This is functionally incorrect. In novel field conditions in broken terrain as$ beats out tiddies every time. Try going near cyclic on a tiddies and see how that works out. Poor gal is gonna have hearing loss and a TBI. The as$ can handle the destructive nature of such a test.
Without the ability to go cyclic myself, I pretty much take on Dale Earnhardts strategy of “find a wall and beat it up.”
 
This is functionally incorrect. In novel field conditions in broken terrain as$ beats out tiddies every time. Try going near cyclic on a tiddies and see how that works out. Poor gal is gonna have hearing loss and a TBI. The as$ can handle the destructive nature of such a test.
It also must be done on the clock and under stress
 
Back
Top