J-Daddy
WKR
Look at it this way...Randy can take his setup with NO stabilizer and out shoot all of us with any stabilizer we want..lol
Look at it this way...Randy can take his setup with NO stabilizer and out shoot all of us with any stabilizer we want..lol
Exactly how I carry my bow. If I'm wearing the right pack, I hardly need to hang onto it with my hand, it locks right in.Not only that when in the backcountry I throw my bow over my shoulder quite frequently and have the stab in front of my chest facing down. It is very comfortable to carry it this way and the longer stab makes it a bonus, the bow just about sits there on my shoulder perfect.
With those bows IMO you will have a far better hold with a stab. I chose the Spyder 30 this year and played around without a stab and saw long range my overall groups increased in size. I went back to a 10" Fuse Blade stab and even added 2 oz of weight to it. Holds very well and can hold some very good groupings at 100 yards 6-7" pretty regularly. I can not hold those same groups without a stab. Not only that when in the backcountry I throw my bow over my shoulder quite frequently and have the stab in front of my chest facing down. It is very comfortable to carry it this way and the longer stab makes it a bonus, the bow just about sits there on my shoulder perfect.
You don't have to convince me because I like a certain amount of weight. I will say that I am not shooting game at 100 yards but if a person can reliably shoot a very light setup at 60, then it might be an option with merit - sort of like saving 5lbs on a pack.
What exactly did Ulmer do that got you thinking? I am assuming a bow with no stab. Do you have a link that states this? I have gone smaller too. I went with the Fuse Carbon Blade Sidekick this year. I really like how it adds to the already offset Hoyt risers but it is a touch heavy (to which I agree with stability). It also makes carrying the bow from the grip nice as the stab isn't in the way for carrying either left or right-handed.