SilencerCo Scythe Ti failures

[Marbles]

Failed at under 500rds. 350 +\- of 19” 260AI and 150 ish from a 18” 7SAUM. # ME TOO
View attachment 974932View attachment 974933

View attachment 974934

Interesting failure point.

 

[Jbehredt]

Failed at under 500rds. 350 +\- of 19” 260AI and 150 ish from a 18” 7SAUM. # ME TOO
View attachment 974932View attachment 974933

View attachment 974934

Ooh, that’s a new one. Exciting. Almost like a cardboard croissant dough container. More boom than pop though.

 

[mt100gr.]

Side ports!!!

 

[waspocrew]

Interesting failure point for sure. A little more concerning if someone is shooting off to the side of you when that goes off compared to half of the suppressor flying down range.

 

[Bater]

Yeah glad the shrapnel didn’t kiss a human on its way into orbit, never found it. Violent recoil though, rifle tried to jump out of my grip and off the table. Can’t wait for January when I pick up my Airlocks.

 

[North of 60]

Another lawsuit waiting to happen. Ditto on the Airlock

 

[Bater]

I still don’t quite understand why they won’t buy these back instead of simply replacing them. Seems like more liability than a company should want to continue shouldering

 

[khuber84]

I still don’t quite understand why they won’t buy these back instead of simply replacing them. Seems like more liability than a company should want to continue shouldering

$4.5 million reasons........

 

[JGRaider]

I still don’t quite understand why they won’t buy these back instead of simply replacing them. Seems like more liability than a company should want to continue shouldering

Because, according to the idiots at SiCo, the shooters affected by these exploding cans are idiots too, as they always blame it on shooter error.

 

[twall13]

Because, according to the idiots at SiCo, the shooters affected by these exploding cans are idiots too, as they always blame it on shooter error.

I've often wondered how they can consistently blame the problem on improper use when repeatedly people on this thread state they were never asked any questions about it. The can was just repaired and returned. If they aren't actually asking questions when a can fails, how can they blame the user? Makes it feel even more like a cop out. You'd think they'd want to know if it was really user error or if they have a problem they should be figuring out. Feels more like sticking their head in the sand and hoping it goes away.

Sent from my Pixel 9 Pro using Tapatalk