Isn't it true that Pfizer and Maderna asked for complete immunity before releasing the vaccine?
Yes but that’s not uncommon. And it wasn’t granted by every country.
Isn't it true that Pfizer and Maderna asked for complete immunity before releasing the vaccine?
I hope Fatbacks won't mind me quoting this posting, I found it incredibly important with this topic. He shared this in the "Vaccine" thread which was regrettably closed. His thoughts are very poignant as it relates to your 'survival of the fittest" comment....Godspeed to those who get the shot.
Nothing I've read in 150 something posts makes me want to get the vaccine.
This place is full of hunters that see first hand it's survival of the fittest.
What happened to building your own immune system?
Yes. I think the asking didn't come from them, but was guaranteed by the govt. This is not unusual. In fact, many of the infrastructure for mass production of vaccines had been driven offshore b/c of lawsuits. Many companies stopped trying to produce vaccines as the tort laws and claims had gotten out of hand. It almost doesn't matter what vaccine you're going to produce, something bad/fatal is going to happen to someone. Hopefully this is more in the 1/10 mil vs. 1/50k kind of thing.Isn't it true that Pfizer and Maderna asked for complete immunity before releasing the vaccine?
I wasn't able to serve in the military, but that sentiment is definately helping form my perspective on whether to get the vaccine. The US wouldn't be much of a place to live if some who preceded us weren't willing to sacrifice to win and defend our freedom. I will admit it bothers me a bit to see some people who appear to have made their decision based solely on the answer to the question "what's in it for me?"."I served in the army for over a decade trying to make America a better place and if I can get a vaccine to help America get back to normal and help confer greater immunity to society then I am all for it."
Sorry to hear. Hopefully you come out well in the end.I'm in the camp of having had "mild" symptoms (the medical category term - "mild" still sucked) for 3 weeks, including pneumonia in one lung. I was previously completely healthy otherwise. Several months later I learned I have ground glass opacities in my lungs. I don't know what that means in the context of C-19, or for me long term, but I'm pretty sure it isn't good. Not saying this should be a dispositive issue for anyone, especially since it's anecdotal, but I offer it for consideration - especially for those who think that C-19 outcomes are binary (death or survival without any ongoing issues).
BTW, the x-ray was a great excuse to my buddies as to why I couldn't keep up in Idaho!
Apologies to those who watched the nuked thread for what's a combination of several of my posts there.
This place is full of hunters that use sophisticated tools to hunt prey. Hunters whose lives have been saved by antibiotics. This place is full of hunters who have gone through radiation therapy to treat cancers and tumors.Godspeed to those who get the shot.
Nothing I've read in 150 something posts makes me want to get the vaccine.
This place is full of hunters that see first hand it's survival of the fittest.
What happened to building your own immune system?
Thanks! I’m optimistic and apologize if my post sounded like I was complaining.Sorry to hear. Hopefully you come out well in the end.
A lot of those people, if they were born after ~1960 are alive and not paralyzed because those that came before them went and got a polio shot. A crap ton of us are only alive because those that came before got the smallpox vaccine. There were some risks with both of them. There were adverse reaction with both of them. But back then there was far less everybody for themselves libertarian hellscape ideology.I wasn't able to serve in the military, but that sentiment is definately helping form my perspective on whether to get the vaccine. The US wouldn't be much of a place to live if some who preceded us weren't willing to sacrifice to win and defend our freedom. I will admit it bothers me a bit to see some people who appear to have made their decision based solely on the answer to the question "what's in it for me?".
"It's a hard no for me dog"This is relevant..
A long bow isn't all that sophisticated but I understand your point.This place is full of hunters that use sophisticated tools to hunt prey. Hunters whose lives have been saved by antibiotics. This place is full of hunters who have gone through radiation therapy to treat cancers and tumors.
Take it, don't take it, I don't give a shit but it's nothing new under the sun. Men make tools. Always have. It's just a tool.
Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk
An excellent reply by a well informed individual. 100% agree. I received my vaccine yesterday. I am 43, 150lbs, 5’10”, Caucasian, fit and healthy. I am considered high risk to catch the virus (given my job) but would be considered “low risk” for having much if any symptoms if infected, and even much less risk to have severe symptoms. However to quote the quote that Broomd shared, “this has nothing to do with survival of the fittest” and everything to do with decreasing the odds, odds that may be already really really low and an odd that could have the most severest of consequences even in the young and healthy...all be it not the norm. For me the data is convincing and the benefits are obvious. Long term efficacy is the unknown, but not a deal breaker. Short term side effects, not any different than any other vaccine. Long term side effects..... unknown but given the mRNAs mechanism of action and physical structure likely to be minimal and quite rare.I'll try and address some of the concerns in this thread and some from Jmez above.
First off, how is it not a strong data set? Both vaccine studies were very large >30k, double-blinded, placebo-controlled studies, which is the GOLD standard. The primary endpoints were pre-specified. The efficacy of both vaccines were abundantly clear (both FDA advisory committees voted overwhelmingly to support the emergency use authorization). I can tell you this study was highly watched as for once, we all had a stake in the game.
You are correct about the concerns for the handling of the Pfizer vaccine, but this is also highly regulated. I'm not saying there won't be some temperature deviations and lots that are thrown out, but these won't be administered. If I was able to give experimental ebola drugs in Africa without a dependable power source that had to be kept below -50, I'm not too worried about the vaccine here.
Okay, to address of the other comments: 1) The mRNA in the vaccine is directed to make the spike protein from SARS-CoV2. While mutations have occurred in this spike protein, there is no indication that this will greatly impact the efficacy of the vaccine. The issue with the influenza virus is quite different, but suffice to say not a similar comparison here.
2) There are still many unknowns, but what we do know are what the common side effects are (injection-site soreness, malaise, chills, joint pain). Most of these occur after the booster shot (i.e., when the immune system has been primed). What we don't know are the incidence of serious rare adverse events, however we should be getting a better handle on this quit soon as hundreds of thousands are being exposed. I would bet that some of these (e.g. 1/50,000) will occur, but hopefully the benefit/risk will stay acceptable.
3) There have already been some cases of anaphylaxis reported. This does not surprise me at all, especially given the lipid nanoparticle (think tiny fat globule...olive oil in vinegar) that is used to deliver the mRNA into are cells. This vaccine in some degree does what the virus does and hijacks our cellular machinery to make the spike protein so our immune system can then recognize it.
I'm happy to answer any other questions if I can. In full disclosure I'm not an expert on infectious disease or vaccine development, but I do have expertise on mRNA and drug development.
I will be receiving the Pfizer vaccine tomorrow at 0900.
A bunch of my team got it over the last 24 hours and will get it over the weekend. We schedule for our booster at the time of our initial vaccination.
With all due respect, is this a reasonable expectation? Is it reasonable for the Average Joe to be able to wade through all of the click bait scare tactics and assess the quality information with any degree of comprehension?All I can recommend is, Educate yourself and make a choice.
With all due respect, is this a reasonable expectation?
With all due respect, is this a reasonable expectation? Is it reasonable for the Average Joe to be able to wade through all of the click bait scare tactics and assess the quality information with any degree of comprehension?
Trusted experts used to do this for us, but with every single question being part of some conspiracy theory/allegation these days, that may be a relic of the past.
I'm not convinced that the average person, with no scientific knowledge/background, even has a chance to educate themselves on something like this.
Meanwhile, every Karen on FB with a GED education spends 10 minutes watching a crackpot YouTube video and forms an opinion which he/she then has the audacity to spread to other equally clueless individuals so that they can educate themselves and make a choice...
The information wasn't available in years past. Professional journals, scientific studies, etc weren't available to the public in significant volume. Now there're available, but it's only confusing the issue IMO. Understanding and truly being able to process/digest scientific information is not an easy/intuitive process. Hell, within my field, even reading the abstracts becomes a disaster. To have a valid opinion, evaluating methods and processing some of the raw data becomes necessary. What percentage of the US population is even remotely capable of doing these things???Has it ever been a reasonable expectation? If it is not, then who's job its it to tell them what they should think?
No one should be getting their information on what to do here from the news or social media, including this site.
Well.....the same resources that existed back in the days of no internet still exist today. I know, it’s amazing we survived. Go to your physician and get their expert opinion and ask for literature on the subject. The same medical journals with research studies that help guide medical care do still exist, in paper form and electronic.With all due respect, is this a reasonable expectation? Is it reasonable for the Average Joe to be able to wade through all of the click bait scare tactics and assess the quality information with any degree of comprehension?
Trusted experts used to do this for us, but with every single question being part of some conspiracy theory/allegation these days, that may be a relic of the past.
I'm not convinced that the average person, with no scientific knowledge/background, even has a chance to educate themselves on something like this.
Meanwhile, every Karen on FB with a GED education spends 10 minutes watching a crackpot YouTube video and forms an opinion which he/she then has the audacity to spread to other equally clueless individuals so that they can educate themselves and make a choice...
"find a consensus opinion among experts in the field, and do what it says".