NJ-Hunting
FNG
I'm really torn between the pro version and the regulars. Looking forward to hearing what you guys find out when you get the Pro version in hand.
Sig is wiping the HDX from the market. The decision will made for you shortly.I'm really torn between the pro version and the regulars. Looking forward to hearing what you guys find out when you get the Pro version in hand.
This is true, but I'm sure i'll still be able to find them someplace for a good month or so. Main thing is to wait long enough to hear the initial reviews of the pros and make a decision after that.Sig is wiping the HDX from the market. The decision will made for you shortly.
That is greatI just called Sig customer service and they said there aren’t any plans to discontinue the 42’s. Makes sense to keep them around since the 50 Pro’s are a new line instead of just an update like the HDX’s were to the original grey model.
The 12x42 and the 16x50 have a similar exit pupil, so in theory this should help us understand how much better the ED glass/coatings are. Any chance you could do a side by side at dusk/dawn and report back?Mine came in last night, 16x50's. Delivered from Scopelist. Super early, initial review here...
This is in comparison to previous generation Zulu6 12x42's.
Pro's:
-Not having to switch from stabilization mode to target mode is very nice, you just have the singular click and you're done
-Glass appears to have much better lighting, as expected
-Overall, just a nicer setup at 16x50 and truly feels like solution to carrying one singular optic and ditching the spotting scope. For me, this is what I was after with ultralight backpacking.
Con's vs the 12x42's:
-Holding the 16's seemed way more challenging one-hand as one would do pulling from a harness, but still very doable and a tradeoff vs the previous smaller platform, and the additional ounces you do feel when one handing. For me this is a tradeoff as one-handing ease is pretty important bow-hunting when holding bow in other hand.
-Similar to point one, because the optics are larger, it's very challenging to click the stabilization on with one hand when you first pull your binos out. You need to almost use two-hands for a second, and then you can switch to the one.
-The toggle from the on/off switch to the clarity dial gap is kind of far apart, and you have to shift your hand and adjust to go in-between, again making you feel like you need two hands. However, if you just click the stabilization on and keep it on for your session, not a bit deal.
-It's possible that auto shift from target mode to lock on mode may cause further dizziness/sickness. I don't personally any problems with this, but for anybody who does it shifting back and forth could actually be problematic for some.
Ultimately, my thoughts are. If you hunt multiple species with various landscapes and looking for a spotting scope replacement these seem like the solution. Love them so far for my use-case as I hunt bow, muzzleloader, rifle in the western states.
However, if you are only a bowhunter or east coast hunter with smaller landscapes, go with the 12x42's previous generation as the ease of one-handing for that type of hunting will outweigh the improvements in glass and the auto target/lock-on mode feature.
Hope this helps!
I sold my 12x42s prior to the purchase of these unfortunately, sorryThe 12x42 and the 16x50 have a similar exit pupil, so in theory this should help us understand how much better the ED glass/coatings are. Any chance you could do a side by side at dusk/dawn and report back?
No worries! Thanks for the great review!!I sold my 12x42s prior to the purchase of these unfortunately, sorry
I pre-ordered the 18's with Doug as well. Excited to see how these stack up against my HDX 16's. Love those except at low light. NL's and a BTX setup were on my shopping list this year but after running the 16's I have zero desire for alpha glass that still requires lugging around and setting up a tripod.
Any response from @Camera Land or @gr8fuldoug ?[mention]Camera Land [/mention]
Any update on shipping dates for these Doug? I’ve emailed and tried calling to get an update on my pre order but no info so far. I called and spoke with you before pre ordering and you expected them by now.
One of the complaints I have heard from the HDXs is the low light performance, what is your experience with the low light performance?Agreed. Canon already has a 15x50IS that is better in every way than these new Sigs, and cheaper. Sig beat the IS market by making them small and light. I hope the regular HDX 42’s don’t get discontinued, if I need a warranty replacement I’d be pissed if they sent out the new model.