I think the distinction is something like this:
You’ll see Form and others reference “killing” bullets. These 116s are lethal, as in, they’re great bullets to kill with. For example, great choice in culling environment. In that use case, a bullet favoring DRT/Maximum carnage makes sense. Are those animals being used for meat also? Probably in some cases at least, but that’s not really the goal.
Very different scenario from many guys, who have a couple tags each year in the western states. If they’re going to eat wild game all year, they may be relying on an elk and a deer or two. Which means if they put one of these 116s through the front shoulders of an animal, it could legitimately leave a hole in the freezer. I know many guys who fall into this category. They’re doing great to kill an elk and a deer on OTC tags every year.
That’s why I said originally that for many guys, the “food” hunts and the “fun/trophy” hunts are the same thing. For those guys, finding a bullet sits somewhere around “adequate killing wound channel” might be more desirable than “horrific cannonball wound”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk