OneGunTex
Lil-Rokslider
Something similar was proposed elsewhere regarding Alaska - the opinion that all NR tags should be a lottery.
What would be the downside to all big game tags being draw tags (or a certain number of "quota" tags available for purchase right up until the season starts)? Would that bring more accountability to both hunters and natural resources departments, by forcing DNR to publish what the harvest goal is for any given species/area and providing more data on the number of hunters hunting a given species/area?
I could see where it doesn't make a lot of sense for something like whitetail in Texas (5 tags automatically with every license) compared to something like a caribou in Alaska where they are monitoring the population of a specific herd.
What would you like to see as a "draw" or "quota" tag, even if there are only 500 people for 10000 tags?
What would be the downside to all big game tags being draw tags (or a certain number of "quota" tags available for purchase right up until the season starts)? Would that bring more accountability to both hunters and natural resources departments, by forcing DNR to publish what the harvest goal is for any given species/area and providing more data on the number of hunters hunting a given species/area?
I could see where it doesn't make a lot of sense for something like whitetail in Texas (5 tags automatically with every license) compared to something like a caribou in Alaska where they are monitoring the population of a specific herd.
What would you like to see as a "draw" or "quota" tag, even if there are only 500 people for 10000 tags?