cbynum80
FNG
has anyone played around with a 6.5 prc or 6.5 rpm with 18” barrel or something similar?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Creedmoor speeds with extra recoil essentially… I guess you might be getting a touch more velocity.. but not sure if it’s justified, which is why I sold my prc.Wouldn’t that make it a creedmor?
Definitely not achievable with an 18” 6.5cm… not hard to do while hand loading for an 18” 6cm I imagine though. But barrel life is going to be short with speeds like that if it matters to you.Just finished a Kimber Montana with an 18” Mullerworks chambered in 6.5 SAUM. I’ve only tried Magpro because I’ve had great results with it. I’m running 135 Bergers at 3000fps without much effort. I also got 156s to 2800fps with pushing too hard.
If a 6.5 Creed can make the same velocities the pressures would have to be way beyond safe.
Wouldn’t that make it a creedmor?
I would say that’s a pretty insignificant difference to worry about for any cartridge. Pick a priority and don’t think about it after deciding. Bullet speed or maneuverability. Both will be negligibly different, so pick one and go have fun. That’s just my opinionchopping and threading my tikka tomorrow to 18" or 19".. Can't decide!
18, I got a 6cm 20” wish it was 16 or 18…chopping and threading my tikka tomorrow to 18" or 19".. Can't decide!
Considering I was getting 2520 out of a 20" 6.5 CM (140 ELD) I tend to think the 6.5PRC short is a great option - you get more velocity out of a shorter barrel.Just getting an 18" barrel in 6.5 PRC broken in on a CA MPR. Average of 2730 to 2780 depending on which factory load. Only about 50 rounds into it so it might speed up a bit yet as it breaks in.
According to GRT sim, with the same 140 ELD 6.5 PRC load, reducing barrel length from Tikka OEM of 24.3" (2,997 MV) to 18" (2,776 MV), results in a net loss of 221 fps at the muzzle.I would say that’s a pretty insignificant difference to worry about for any cartridge. Pick a priority and don’t think about it after deciding. Bullet speed or maneuverability. Both will be negligibly different, so pick one and go have fun. That’s just my opinion
He is asking about 18” vs 19”. Why are you comparing 18” to 24”?According to GRT sim, with the same 140 ELD 6.5 PRC load, reducing barrel length from Tikka OEM of 24.3" (2,997 MV) to 18" (2,776 MV), results in a net loss of 221 fps at the muzzle.
Difference at 300 yards
2637 fps -.92 mil drop .34 mil windage
2433 fps -1.13 mil drop .37 mil windage
Difference at 500 yards
2412 fps -2.2 mil drop .57 mil windage
2219 fps -2.66 mil drop .64 mil windage
The 24" barrel maintains 1900 fps slightly beyond 1,000 yards. The 18" barrel drops below 1900 fps at 850 yards. If terminal performance at very long range is important to you, the longer barrel has the advantage. Inside 500 yards, with an accurate rifle, range finder, dialing scope, and lots of practice, the differences can be negligible indeed.
Roger that, confused with a different thread. 18-19 won't make any material difference. Existing barrel length vs cut length is what I was highlighting. My bad and with a 7"ish suppressor I think 18" is ideal for handling and velocity.He is asking about 18” vs 19”. Why are you comparing 18” to 24”?