Sacrificing weapon quality for buck/herd quality and opportunity

Will this help buck/herd quality and who is willing to put down their rifle to hunt deer more often?

  • It will help the herd/buck quality and I’m willing to hunt deer with a “primitive weapon”

    Votes: 61 56.0%
  • It won’t help the herd/buck quality and it’s just taking away rifle hunts that will never come back

    Votes: 32 29.4%
  • Leave everything the way it is

    Votes: 15 13.8%
  • Make a muzzleloader specific general season in between the archery and rifle season

    Votes: 11 10.1%
  • Something else, please explain in the comments

    Votes: 6 5.5%

  • Total voters
    109

CMF

WKR
Joined
May 8, 2019
Messages
974
Location
Mississippi
Yeah limiting archery success is the harder weapon to address. Archery success and participation from 2000 to know is up considerably. Maybe limit it to 1 pin / no slider.
I'm saying its already so limiting, adding regulations to archery sights is just creating unnecessary regulation... Don't mess with it
 

SDHNTR

WKR
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
7,383
Exactly, just make archery traditional only. Done deal
How is this even in the same conversation as limiting rifles capable of killing big game at 1000 yards?

An 80 yard weapon like a modern compound bow doesn’t need more limitations.

Again, the need for common sense abounds.
 

JFK

WKR
Joined
Sep 13, 2016
Messages
883
It’s nonsense to suggest that rifles that can effectively hit things at 3x the distance they used to havent changed anything with regard to efficacy and success. How could that be possible?

I use one, and don’t feel bad about it. But if a game agency recognized there was an issue and made some changes to address it I don’t think I’d judge them that harshly.

It would hurt opportunity….a lot. Some people would go out and buy a bow or a muzzleloader. Probably quite a few wouldn’t. and they’d stop hunting or go elsewhere. Some of the ones that did adopt primitive gear would learn it’s much harder, not get a deer for multiple seasons and then quit. I’ve hunted in areas that have both rifle and primitive sections and the primitive sections are universally less crowded on every day of season.
 

S.Clancy

WKR
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Messages
2,615
Location
Montana
How is this even in the same conversation as limiting rifles capable of killing big game at 1000 yards?

An 80 yard weapon like a modern compound bow doesn’t need more limitations.

Again, the need for common sense abounds.
I'm saying do both.
 

NickyD

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Sep 24, 2020
Messages
187
Location
Denver, CO
I’d like to see a variety of management styles. Some units could be primitive weapons only and others using modern rifles. Majority of people are content with shooting younger bucks and it’s important to allow them to do that. The barrier to entry would also be too high for most people if they weren’t allowed to use a scoped rifle.
 

Hnthrdr

WKR
Joined
Jan 29, 2022
Messages
3,875
Location
The West
I’d like to see a variety of management styles. Some units could be primitive weapons only and others using modern rifles. Majority of people are content with shooting younger bucks and it’s important to allow them to do that. The barrier to entry would also be too high for most people if they weren’t allowed to use a scoped rifle.
Gramps killed plenty of bucks with an iron sight 30-30 in the northern AZ desert mountains… I think we could do the same today
 
Top